Jump to content

Pocket Query: Items to Include / Exclude


Wayfarer-MD

Recommended Posts

"Items to Include" has a list of selectable attributes. Does it work on a and basis or an or basis?

Specifically, if I select Thing1 and Thing 2, do I get only sites that

. . 1) have both Thing1 and Thing2, or

. . 2) have either Thing1 or Thing2.

 

"Items to Exclude" has the same list selectable attributes. Does it work on a and basis or an or basis?

Specifically, if I select Thing1 and Thing 2, do I get only sites that

. . 1) have both Thing1 and Thing2, or

. . 2) have either Thing1 or Thing2.

 

Also, what is the difference in operation of both these lists between a selection

without and with the circular red don't sign.

 

My interpretation (guess)

. . . Include normal: Thing1 and Thing2 (must have both)

. . . Include don't: Not Thing1 and Not Thing2 (may not have either)

 

. . . Exclude normal: Thing1 or Thing2 (may not have either)

. . . Exclude don't: Not Thing1 and Not Thing2 (may not have either)

 

All of these permutation possibilities make it very confusing. The website certainly needs better clarification.

Link to comment
"Items to Include" has a list of selectable attributes. Does it work on a and basis or an or basis?

Specifically, if I select Thing1 and Thing 2, do I get only sites that

. . 1) have both Thing1 and Thing2, or

. . 2) have either Thing1 or Thing2.

 

"Items to Exclude" has the same list selectable attributes. Does it work on a and basis or an or basis?

Specifically, if I select Thing1 and Thing 2, do I get only sites that

. . 1) have both Thing1 and Thing2, or

. . 2) have either Thing1 or Thing2.

 

Also, what is the difference in operation of both these lists between a selection

without and with the circular red don't sign.

 

My interpretation (guess)

. . . Include normal: Thing1 and Thing2 (must have both)

. . . Include don't: Not Thing1 and Not Thing2 (may not have either)

 

. . . Exclude normal: Thing1 or Thing2 (may not have either)

. . . Exclude don't: Not Thing1 and Not Thing2 (may not have either)

 

All of these permutation possibilities make it very confusing. The website certainly needs better clarification.

It works on an "OR" basis unless it is stated as "AND." It says "AND" at the top of the conditions for the "that" section. Edited by TrailGators
Link to comment

It works on an "OR" basis unless it is stated as "AND." It says "AND" at the top of the conditions for the "that" section.

 

Thanks for a reply, but it does not say AND. What it does say is:

-------

Attributes to Include

(click to include/exclude certain attributes)

{Pictures of attributes}

--------

Those would be added on an "or" basis. Otherwise the PQ would only output caches that had all the attributes you selected rather than outputting caches that had any of the attributes you selected. Edited by TrailGators
Link to comment

"Excluding Attributes" has a known bug and gives wonky results.

Thanks for the tip- I'll avoid its use. There is some redundancy with Attributes to Exclude ,

as one presumably can use the red exclude selection for the purpose.

 

Perhaps the following is true with respect to using Including Attributes. Suppose

that I've selected Do1 and Do2. And excluded, using the red don't sign, Dont1 and Dont2.

Then, a site would be included if it"

. . "Has Do1 and has Do2 and does not have Dont1 and does not have Dont2."

Link to comment

Those would be added on an "or" basis. Otherwise the PQ would only output caches that had all the attributes you selected rather than outputting caches that had any of the attributes you selected.

Here's the Test:

All caches within 10 miles of N 41° 38.000 W 088° 13.000 - results 333

Add ONLY the "less than one hour" attribute: results: 106

Add ONLY the "handicapped" attribute: results: 21

 

So, if I choose both, and this were an OR statement, I should receive more than 106 but not more than 127 unless ALL of the "handicapped" ones are not labeled "less than one hour". But if I get a result smaller than 21, it's an AND statement.

 

Interesting result is that the COUNT of caches says that it's 127, but if you look at the actual caches, there's 126 caches.

 

SO...

 

It's a true OR statement, gathering caches that are labeled "less than one hour" and adding those results to the list of caches that are labeled "handicapped". But the total number is not aggregating the count of the results. ONE of those caches has both "handicapped" and "less than one hour" on it.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...