Found It = Didn't Find It

[+Criminal]

April 7 by XXXXXXX (86 found)

Kind of. I provided evidence that I was there... but the cache seems to have gone AWOL. v as found after given blessing from MiyoMurf.

[view this log on a separate page]

 

Kind of...

[+Criminal]

June 30 by xxxxxx (172 found)

Since I never really found this but I'm replaceing it I logged it as a find? Ethical? Whatever... if its against rules I'm sure I'll hear about it!

 

If you have to ask...

[+Right Wing Wacko]

July 1 by X XXXX XXXX (1004 found)

All that is left of this cache is the lid. The rest is gone.

 

July 1 by X XXXX XXXX (1004 found)

I found this cache sort-of..... All I found was the lid:( The cache has been muggled:( I rehid the lid for the owner to get during maintance. I did find two handball balls while hunting for the cache.

 

<Sigh>

Edited July 2, 2006 by Right Wing Wacko

[+parker313]

May 1 by SOME CLUELESS CACHER! (5254 found)

Came right over from ET Phone Home so you know we were here...was at ground zero but cache was no longer...took photo with GPS at the 'spot' and since ANOTHER CACHER had previously found this cache, they confirmed that it is MIA.

My heart about stopped when I read that. I thought that was me for a sec when my eyes just jumped to E.T. Phone Home as ETPH is one that just the other day, I logged as a DNF when I *know* I was at the right spot but couldn't find the cache. What a relief when I realized it was someone else (b/c I know I logged mine as a DNF!)...

 

I'm very new to this sport and it would never occur to me to log a cache find just for being in the spot where the cache SHOULD be. There was one that I think was rated 1/1 that I almost couldn't reach (and I'm 5'6") so if I hadn't been able to reach it, I *might* have logged a find before reading all of this...

[+RPW]

May 1 by SOME CLUELESS CACHER! (5254 found)

[from Parker313 ] I'm very new to this sport and it would never occur to me to log a cache find just for being in the spot where the cache SHOULD be. ...

 

For shame! How do you expect to get to 5254 finds with that attitude?

Edited July 3, 2006 by RPW

[+slightlynorth]

June 3 by SSS&GGG (916 found)

Hmmm...well, when you hit 52 caches in one day sometimes it's not easy to remember the details about every cache, and this is just one of those moments. I didn't have a check mark next to the cache name, but my girl JJJJJ assures me we were here and placed a sticker in the logbook. TFTF!

 

June 3 by TSSSSSS (495 found)

If JJJJJ placed a Chicken Run sticker here, I was here. And I'm sticking to that story. Was this one of those caches she had the coords written on her leg after a phone call? Must be. I’ve always held to “It’s all about the numbers, not the journey” so I’m okay with claiming a cache I can’t remember.

 

I was at this cache a few days ago and there is no sticker in the log book...

[+Ed & Julie]

The cache is on private property and you cannot find it? Log a find of course!

 

June 15 by Xxx Xxxx. (1116 found)

NOT SURE WHAT TO DO. WHEN I ARIVED TO THIS SPOT ONCE AGAIN THE CACHE IS ON SOMEONES PRIVET PROPERTY. EVEN WITH PERMISSION I DO NOT LIKE TO GO ON SOMEONES PROPERTY THAT I DO NOT KNOW, OR THEY DO NOT KNOW ME. TO FAR TO DRIVE TO END UP IN SOMEONES YARD YOU DO NOT KNOW. DELETE THE LOG IF YOU WOULD LIKE BUT I WILL NOT BE BACK TO TRY THIS CACHE Xxx Xxxx.

Edited July 4, 2006 by Ed & Julie

[+Ed & Julie]

A cache in the cache owner's front yard:

 

June 15 by Xxx Xxxx. (1116 found)

I AM LOGING THIS AS A FIND EVEN THOUGH I DID NOT LOOK WHATS UP WITH ALL THE CACHES ON PRIVET PROPERTY THIS IS NOT COOL I WOULD NOT LIKE SOMEONE WOUNDERING AROUND AT MY HOUSE YOU ARE JUST ASKING FOR THE WRONG PERSON TO COME ALONG SOMEDAY THAT IS NOT A CACHER DELEAT THE LOG IF YOU WOULD LIKE I WILL NOT BE BACK FOR THIS ONE.

[+Ed & Julie]

He's on a roll:

 

June 15 by Xxx Xxxx. (1116 found)

I AM LOGING THIS AS A FIND EVEN THOUGH I DID NOT LOOK DELETE IT IF YOU WOULD LIKE WHEN I ARIVED ONCE AGAIN CACHE IS ON PRIVET PROPERTY THIS IS NOT RIGHT DROVE 120 MILES ROUND TRIP FOR A BUNCH OF CACHES ON PRIVET PROPERTY NOT COOL.

[+Ed & Julie]

Cache missing? Heck, go ahead and log it as a virtual (with the owner's permission, of course...Wow! Look at those numbers!!):

 

August 28, 2005 by XxxxXxxxx (14750 found)

Grabbed this cache while on our (with 4wheeler) pilgrimage to OR/WA for the Original Stash and the Tunnel of Light caches. Hey (owner), we didn't know that you baked! Thanks

 

August 28, 2005 by xxxxxxxx (4939 found)

Found with XxxxXxxxx on a 258 find Cache-thon up to the APE CAche and Tunnel in Washington. Found cache had been muggled but will log as a virtual. Thanks

Edited July 5, 2006 by Ed & Julie

[+slightlynorth]

Cache missing? Heck, go ahead and log it as a virtual (with the owner's permission, of course...Wow! Look at those numbers!!):

 

August 28, 2005 by XxxxXxxxx (14750 found)

Grabbed this cache while on our (with 4wheeler) pilgrimage to OR/WA for the Original Stash and the Tunnel of Light caches. Hey (owner), we didn't know that you baked! Thanks

 

August 28, 2005 by xxxxxxxx (4939 found)

Found with XxxxXxxxx on a 258 find Cache-thon up to the APE CAche and Tunnel in Washington. Found cache had been muggled but will log as a virtual. Thanks

 

!!!

 

I didn't realize you could do that! My numbers really going to jump now.

[+Wacka]

Be PO'd at the owner, not the logger. He allowed them to log it.

 

I know the cacher you mention. In caches we have both logged and the log hasn't been changed due to being full or muggled, I have seen his signature in every single one. We need more people like him in this hobby. People who really want to go out and find and hide caches and not find fault with others on an internet forum.

Edited July 5, 2006 by Wacka

[+wavector]

Be PO'd at the owner, not the logger. He allowed them to log it.

 

The owner didn't do anything. He didn't replace the cache, he didn't maintain the cache and he didn't write the Found log. The log, as written, has nothing to do with the owner at all and reflects the practices of the geocacher logging the find just as the cache has nothing to do with the finder but reflects the practices of the owner.

 

Logs belong to and reflect the practices of the geocachers writing them.

When I encounter a bogus Found It log on one of my caches I always write a polite note telling people they have logged my cache in error, do not blame me when they won't change their log to a note or a Did Not Find it. I do not look kindly upon people who plant a cache and do not maintain it but I certainly don't blame them for bogus Found logs. I know the guidelines say we (cache owners) are supposed to delete bogus Finds but I have never done that, I do however request a change or deletion by email. I would view a log deletion as encroachment upon something that really isn't mine to control, another's Find count but that is a personal opinion that is in direct contrast to GC guidelines. As a community we do have an interest in identifying bogus Found logs, this thread has many excellent examples, it is easy to find more examples.

 

A Found log confirms that the cache has been found, other log types include "Did Not Find", "Needs Maintenance" and "Should Be Archived" and the catch all category, the "Note". Many bogus Found logs are created by cachers who only wish to increment their Find count. If you go and look for a cache and it is gone it has not been muggled, that is not a log type. Using a Found log to describe a cache that is missing is a bogus Found log, wouldn't you agree ?

[+Ed & Julie]

Another find "awarded" by the cache owner (who also requires a question answered about the cache site):

 

August 20, 2004 by Xxxxxxx (472 found)

After consulting with the cache owner, I was awarded this cache. It really is a great place, just to stop, stretch, and check out some great stuff. Thanks for the cache and the find.

Xxxxxxx from Grover Beach, Ca.

[view this log on a separate page]

 

 

(DNF) August 20, 2004 by Xxxxxxx (472 found)

I'm sure I just missed the thing because I was being distracted by the great looking treats inside. I looked but didn't find it. I'll e-mail the answer anway.

Thanks for the stop. Xxxxxxx from Grover Beach Ca.

Edited July 5, 2006 by Ed & Julie

[+Ed & Julie]

Same cache as all the above, The cache is several hundred miles from the cache owner (placed on vacation, before the guidlines...it's easier to award a find than check the cache):

 

September 2, 2005 by Xxxxxxxx (560 found)

 

3:36 pm. Find # 367. xxxx&xxxxxxxallowed me to log this as a find as I missed the cache replacement by a few hours or less and was able to answer the virtual question (& sampled the smaller version ).

We took an extended Labor Day weekend from Battle Ground WA to visit our daughter and family in Cave Junction OR, geocaching along the way.

 

January 13 by xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (788 found)

Looked high and low, mostly low, as the store manager told us where to look. It simply is not there! We do know what the "bite of heaven" is, however. Because the cache has gone missing, and we not only know, but experienced the "bite of heaven", we'll take credit. Thanks! This is a great place to stop. The management even gave us two complimentary "bites of heaven", and xxxxxxxxx won a lottery ticket for a third!

[+Criminal]

June 21 by XXXXXXX (76 found)

"Found it".....but it wasn't there. The grand parents of the owner said they had the area bulldozed due to storm damage and the cache wsas found and removed for safe keeping. It was in the home of the owner's parents, who had left on an out of state trip that morning. The cache will be replaced sometime in the future.

[+Harry Dolphin]

July 4 by TTTTT (414 found)

Went out with PPPPP and MMMMM to check and replace this cache if needed. We were armed with photos of the original hide, so we know we got the right spot. The original was definately gone.

PPPP brought an ammo can and all of the swag as well as a log book and pen. We left 2 geocoins since there is an event coming up here in a few weeks and they will get moved along rather quickly that way.

 

Replaced cache as originally hidden from the pics.

 

Thanks PPPP for replacing it so we could find it!!!!!

 

TN, Left 2 coins, SL

TTTTT

 

This one sort of bothers me. It is/was one of the classic caches locally. Hidden in 2001 by a team that hid two caches, and have not been active in three years. . And, it is a classic! It took me three tries! Heinously evil cache! But, sadly, it's gone(?) TTTTT and PPPPP set out to replace the cache, meeting MMMMM along the way. PPPPP put out a new cache, and TTTTT and MMMMM found it. None of these cachers had found the original. But, they're sure that it is gone, and replaced it. Hmmm.... I couldn't find any photos that would assure me that I was in the right spot.

Oh, well. Great find TTTTT and MMMMM! ? And who is going to maintain this cache?

[+Criminal]

July 4 by XXXXXXXX (1658 found)

The GPSr zeroed-out in a likely spot but no cache was to be found. I checked the hint which confirmed things. I e-mailed the cache owner who graciously is allowing me to log a find (so I don't have to come back to this park for just one cache). I enjoyed my Contra Loma day with my niece and nephew, thanks DT21 & FW!

[view this log on a separate page]

Edited July 7, 2006 by Keystone

[+Criminal]

July 1 by 6 ZZZZZZZZZ (1014 found)

I found this cache sort-of..... All I found was the lid:( The cache has been muggled:( I rehid the lid for the owner to get during maintance. I did find two handball balls while hunting for the cache. [view this log on a separate page

 

Geolidding! WOOT!

[+Criminal]

June 17 by XXXXXX (1206 found)

Had this one on my list before the last post and didn't realize that it was missing. But yes, I believe it is. Looks like some fresh "cleaning" up around the bench. Perhaps they got the cache as well as the weeds.

 

[+DcCow]

July 1 by 6 ZZZZZZZZZ (1014 found)

I found this cache sort-of..... All I found was the lid:( The cache has been muggled:( I rehid the lid for the owner to get during maintance. I did find two handball balls while hunting for the cache. [view this log on a separate page

 

Geolidding! WOOT!

 

July 5 by Criminal (320 found)

I found a lid next to my trash can, it seems I missed from the free throw line next to my fridge. Anyway, I guess I can log this cache as found for the lid.

 

Thanks!

[view this log on a separate page]

 

Edited July 6, 2006 by DcCow

[+Lehigh Mafia]

July 6 by CacherWithoutAClue (1289 found)

CacherWithoutAClue in town for LiltteCacherWithoutAClue's all-star baseball tournament. Couldn't put our hands on this one. And it cost us 20 cents in the parking meter. What a bummer.

 

Ummm Hello...

[flyingandys]

This newby needs some help. I think I agree with Joe. "If I can HOLD the cache but cannot open it for some reason I think that is a find." But, I'm really, really new to geocaching and have never found a cache that was locked. Are there lots like that out there?

 

www.garmin.blogs.com

[+ravens3]

This newby needs some help. I think I agree with Joe. "If I can HOLD the cache but cannot open it for some reason I think that is a find." But, I'm really, really new to geocaching and have never found a cache that was locked. Are there lots like that out there?

 

www.garmin.blogs.com

 

I don't know about "lots", but there are some really great ones out there that are, truly, just like that. For example, check out GCp9g9, part of the totally tubluar series in Seattle. We touched it, caressed, yes, even fondled it, but were too dense to figure it out without the hint. So, for us, no find. When we got home, read the logs, it was clear, and we laughed at our toopidity. Very cool.

[+Criminal]

Remember this one? It was 'found' again today.

 

July 8 by YYYYYYYY (305 found)

This was in both of my pocket querries from Friday morning when I load my GPS. Searched and didn't find this one, but see that it has been archived. We are claiming it anyway since the archive date isn't shown and we were there looking for something that showed being there 24 hours earlier.

[view this log on a separate page]

<DNF>June 28 by Criminal (319 found)

I want a fake find too! Its missing and it needs to be replaced or archived (again).

[This entry was edited by Criminal on Sunday, July 02, 2006 at 9:32:00 PM.]

[view/edit logs/images on a separate page]

[upload an image for this log]

<ARCHIVE>June 28 by CACHEOWNER (143 found)

Too many problems getting this one to remain where I want it.

Sorry

[view this log on a separate page]

June 28 by XXXXX (1699 found)

Its missing and it needs to be replaced or archived (again)

[view this log on a separate page]

Edited July 9, 2006 by Criminal

[+wavector]

These are all logs from one cache in chronological order with details removed. Nothing has been made up or changed in any way.

 

December 17, 2005 by nnnnn (97 found)

Neat area and unexpected. I would never have known it existed if it hadn't been for this hunt. Thanks for introducing us to a new place. Great, secure container. GPS spot on. Thanks!

[view this log on a separate page]

 

February 1 by nnnnnnn (120 found)

Nice idea, interesting area. We found cache "container" but contents is missing- please, check on it.

[view this log on a separate page]

 

February 11 by nnnnnnnnnnn (108 found)

well this one wasn't too bad but we found it.. much to our suprise... there was NOTHING there....

 

February 12 by nnnnnnnnn (9 found)

found it with nnnnnnnnnnn and boy...but, cache was empty...cool place, though

[view this log on a separate page]

 

February 19 by nnnnnnnnnnnnnn (4 found)

Easy to find. Box and items missing. Left some items. No GPS.

[view this log on a separate page]

 

Now this is starting to get really funny. Of course it is easy to find, cause you haven't found a box or items, what did you find, aha, you found a "SPOT", the next finder of the SPOT confirms that indeed nothing is there. Did you notice that the above geocacher said he "left some items" and the very next log entry below clearly states that "no cache contents there now". I wonder what happened to the "ITEMS" that were left at the "SPOT"!

 

March 23 by nnnnnn (399 found)

Well; found where it was apparantly supposed to be. No cache contents there now. Good educational spot for kids and adults. Grew up in this area and know it well. (used to play baseball here many moons ago).

[view this log on a separate page]

 

April 5 by nnnnnnnnnn (411 found)

Well, I found the spot and the Geocache sheet you had taped on the container, but the cache itself was nowhere to be found. I claim a find but it needs some maintenance.

[view this log on a separate page]

 

April 17 by nnnn (231 found)

Found while out with my kids doing some caching and seeing how people lived years ago. As stated in posts before, I found the location, saw the cache sheet but no other items where there. Nice hide and nice place to visit. By the way, the kids checked out the bell. I'm sure that the locals enjoyed hearing it ring nearly 100 times.

Happy Caching !!!!!

[view this log on a separate page]

 

Is this killing you, it is now a nice hide.

 

April 23 by nnnnnnnn (128 found)

I love this place. Thanks for the re-visit!

[view this log on a separate page]

 

April 25 by nnnnnnnnnnnn (84 found)

Nice place. Loved the log house.

[view this log on a separate page]

 

May 27 by nnnnnnnnnn (10 found)

Nice hiding spot and cabin.

[view this log on a separate page]

 

May 28 by nnnnnnnn (430 found)

Like others, found cache sheet but no more.

[view this log on a separate page]

 

The "cache sheet" becomes the "cache site",devolution.

 

June 2 by nnnnnnn (475 found)

Found cache site but nothing to sign.

Will email picture of cache location.

[view this log on a separate page]

 

No lie!!! Rocket scientists at work.

 

June 4 by nnnnnnnnnnmememebama (2 found)

Site is not plastic container. Found, but no log.

[view this log on a separate page]

 

June 7 by nnnnnnnnnnnn (257 found)

Not sure if what I found is correct, but I did find an object here that could be a micro cache container, except for no log. I stuck a piece of paper in it to serve as a temporary log, and replaced it where it was. Unless cache owner tells me differently, I'll count it as "found". Thanks for bringing me to this place!

[view this log on a separate page]

 

Now things have taken a turn for the worse for sure, everybody has found the "SPOT" but this guy could mess it all up by blatantly admitting he found "SOMETHING", this could get ugly. At least he adds paper to the thing that he found so now the spot has a container and a logbook, getting to be regular "NICE HIDE". Problems appear when the next guys shows up and finds another thing that is clearly the geocache, it has no paper it, did some one steal the log ?

 

June 13 by nnnn nnnnn (2540 found)

Found it - a quick find this time.

Correct container is unmistakable and clearly identifies itself as a geocache. Found no log, so signed and put in part of index card as a log. TN. Thanks for the cache.

[view this log on a separate page]

 

"a quick find this time", there was another time ?

 

June 14 by nnnnnnnnn (9 found)

This was our first geocaching experience. Found the log nnnn nnnnn left yesterday. Not many people know about this log cabin in the suburbs. TNLSSL.

[view this log on a separate page]

 

At least the use of "TFTC" was avoided in this log, very astute of the geocacher to figure out that there was really no one to receive the thank you. Perhaps the new mnemonic should be WITB?. The "SPOT" where there is a "NICE HIDE" has an owner who has been active the entire time on GC, yes the entire time that this was going on, he was even out caching, really. More you say....

 

June 22 by nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn (514 found)

I love being a teacher and having my summers free. This was the first of 7 finds for me today. I've been to the nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn many times, and never knew this cache was close. TFTH. Found the "temporary index notecard log" but I'm betting that once it rains, it's gonna need replacing again.

[view this log on a separate page]

 

June 25 by nnnnnnnnnnn (558 found)

What an interesting place visit this early Sunday morning. Thanks for bringing us here. SL

[view this log on a separate page

 

June 29 by nnnnn (122 found)

Found late this afternoon while in the area building a koi pond and stream bed water feature. No water resistant container for the makeshift log/index card, so I placed a new micro log inside a 35mm film cannister for future cachers to sign. Thanks for the fun....

-nnnnn

[view this log on a separate page]

 

If you look at this log above and the log from June 13 and the log from June 7 then you have to be wondering, what the heck has this guy just replaced ? The container which is "clearly identified as a geocache" which was harbouring part of an "index card" or the object that "could be a micro cache container" that had a "piece of paper" added to it on June 7th and was then put back where it was found. Did he just throw out the owner's clearly marked cache container ? If the next geocacher finds something different should they claim a legitimate find as well ? I really have no interest in this beyond the sheer delight in finding such a convoluted cache history, not many stories read like this one. I have included every log entry from the last good find of the "original secure cache container". This is sort of like a cuckoo cache, the original cache has been replaced with something entirely different. This is comedy at it's very best. Do you realize that one of these cachers actually had this as his first cache experience, poor guy.

Edited July 9, 2006 by wavector

[+Criminal]

Too tired to post the logs, just go here.

[FallenFaery]

Hmm.. logged a cache that is in Chicago while at GeoBash...

 

July 8 by CCCCCCC (15820 found)

Found the official logsheet for the cache at the MidWestGeoBash. It is in need of repair and the cacher who has it will be in touch with you soon. They are on their way home.

[+Corp Of Discovery]

Hmm.. logged a cache that is in Chicago while at GeoBash...

 

July 8 by CCCCCCC (15820 found)

Found the official logsheet for the cache at the MidWestGeoBash. It is in need of repair and the cacher who has it will be in touch with you soon. They are on their way home.

 

That is just so sad. Someone who is not even the cache owner removing the cache and showing it to someone else to log as a find. Don't think there's much question that the cacher who made the above log is a cheat. Always had some doubts, but those have now been erased. The person who removed the log is no better either. Shame on them both.

Edited July 11, 2006 by Corp Of Discovery

[+briansnat]

Hmm.. logged a cache that is in Chicago while at GeoBash...

 

July 8 by CCCCCCC (15820 found)

Found the official logsheet for the cache at the MidWestGeoBash. It is in need of repair and the cacher who has it will be in touch with you soon. They are on their way home.

 

[FallenFaery]

Hmm.. logged a cache that is in Chicago while at GeoBash...

 

July 8 by CCCCCCC (15820 found)

Found the official logsheet for the cache at the MidWestGeoBash. It is in need of repair and the cacher who has it will be in touch with you soon. They are on their way home.

 

That is just so sad. Someone who is not even the cache owner removing the cache and showing it to someone else to log as a find. Don't think there's much question that the cacher who made the above log is a cheat. Always had some doubts, but those have now been erased. The person who removed the log is no better either. Shame on them both.

 

I ashamed that the person who removed it and took it there is from our area. Seen enough evidence to know that the cacher who had the gall to log it, is a number padder. Hey.. whatever but I have to laugh when other cachers put that person on a pedestal just because of the number "finds". Might as well log the other 99 BoBs while they're at it.

[wheetree]

"I found the proper XXXX and searched all over but came up empty so I replaced the missing container with a film canister. Thanks for the walk."

 

This came up recently on one of my watches. I found this thread when looking for something as to whether this (replacing someone else's cache) is acceptable or not.

[FallenFaery]

Looks like one of our local reviewers are on top of it .

 

Location: Illinois, United States

Reviewer Jones temporarily disabled BoB 67 (Disabled) (Traditional Cache) at 7/11/2006

 

Log Date: 7/11/2006

After the trouble earlier this year with moving caches, I would have thought these were nailed down.

 

Caches don't move, folks. This one's locked until it's replaced at its posted coordinates and the false logs are removed.

 

Owner, contact me when this is done.

 

RJ

[FallenFaery]

From the cache description:

 

When you find the cache, you will need the combination to the paddlock

 

So to log this cache you would need to open the lock and sign the log.

 

 

 

Looks like signing the container started way before GW4

 

January 28 by TTTTTTT (1703 found)

We found it easily as the coords are right on the money. I forgot my pass key so signing the log was something else. I tried to slide our sig card in but I dont know if it made it or not so I signed the cache container in small print. Very Clever job!!!!!! Thanks.

 

January 27 by CCCCCCCC(77 found)

Found the cache, very clever. We were unable to open it, so I'm just loggin it here.

 

November 12, 2005 by HHHHHHHH (1810 found)

We found your cache this afternoon at 2:35pm but, for the life of us, we couldn't figure out how to open it. With a few muggles in the area, we didn't want to spend too much time tinkering with it. So, we did not officially sign the log but we did get one of our sig cards into it to prove that we were there. Hope that suffices. TFTC.

 

 

Hey! Somebody that actually gets it and logged a DNF.

 

July 5 by BBBBBBB (24 found)

Found the container, but didn't know the combination. Now we will plan to head back there with your clue. Hope to drop off a Travel Bug.

Edited July 12, 2006 by FallenFaery & Special Ed

[FallenFaery]

June 15 by EEEEEE(2221 found)

New utility pole replaced the old and allowed the pup to escape. Thanks for hunting the Dalmatians, EssPea.

 

So it was archived because the cache and the pole were removed. Do you think this stopped someone from logging a find???

 

July 3 by BBBBBBBBBB (4129 found)

Out for a full afternoon/evening of caching with XXXXX and XXXXX. XXXX enjoyed the company of XXXXX while I made the hunt. TFTC!

Edited July 12, 2006 by FallenFaery & Special Ed

[FallenFaery]

July 9 by TTTTTT (2506 found)

Out with some family friends from some town in, NC and we tried to find this one, called the owner to verify we were in the right place and he told us to log it and he would replace asap. Thanks for placing this cache for us to find!!!

[FallenFaery]

July 5 by JJJJJJJJJJJJJ (3187 found)

Cache is gone but I initialed in the area as a find.

 

A different cache but same result..

 

June 26 by kkkkkkk (41 found)

logging it as a find, but the "log" is missing

Edited July 12, 2006 by FallenFaery & Special Ed

[FallenFaery]

July 5 by JJJJJJJJJ (3187 found)

Another one thats missing...saw deer in the creek nearby..lots of mosquitoes signed in the vicinity anyways.

 

Same cache... the owner posted this....

 

July 5 by OWNER (0 found)

This cache is indeed missing, so it's now temporarily disabled.

DISABLED means the cache is NOT THERE, so currently, this cache cannot be "Found". There should be no "Found it" logs entered on this cache page until the cache is replaced and enabled again.

 

Initialing, signing (or sticking a sticker onto) anything other than the cache log itself does not count as a legitimate "Find" for this or any other cache in this series that is disabled. Please refrain from doing so.

 

Your patience is appreciated. After all, there are plenty of other, active caches in the neighborhood to be found! Thanks, and have fun!

 

NO.. you won't be disappointed...

 

July 8 by CCCCCCCCCC (15820 found)

The cache log was at the MidWestGeoBash where I signed it. I was not the party that brought it to the bash so you'll have to ask that person. Since i did sign the offical log, does this count??? Just curious.

[FallenFaery]

Wow.. lots of good stuff today..

 

June 10 by WWWWWWWWW (933 found)

Leveled our search zerored in on the spot. Evidence of likely hide, but alas no cache. Could this one be missing

Confirmed with owner we had the correct location. He gives us the ok on the find, since we confirmed it was missing. Thanks Cache Owner!

[FallenFaery]

This cache had been disabled since December because of construction..

 

June 17 by RRRRR RRR (502 found)

The Group of 6.. (list of names)! We started from MIDWEST STATE around 4am and headed for XXXX CACHE (first cache of the day). After picking up A CACHER there, we moved on towards A BIG CITY!!

We found the first CACHE around 9:50am, and the hunt was on!!! After a few wrong turns, a couple bathroom breaks and LOTS of stops, we finished our mission...LOTS found!

 

101 caches total!!!!

 

TfTCs

 

[Rupert2]

July 5 by JJJJJJJJJ (3187 found)

Another one thats missing...saw deer in the creek nearby..lots of mosquitoes signed in the vicinity anyways.

 

Same cache... the owner posted this....

 

July 5 by OWNER (0 found)

This cache is indeed missing, so it's now temporarily disabled.

DISABLED means the cache is NOT THERE, so currently, this cache cannot be "Found". There should be no "Found it" logs entered on this cache page until the cache is replaced and enabled again.

 

Initialing, signing (or sticking a sticker onto) anything other than the cache log itself does not count as a legitimate "Find" for this or any other cache in this series that is disabled. Please refrain from doing so.

 

Your patience is appreciated. After all, there are plenty of other, active caches in the neighborhood to be found! Thanks, and have fun!

 

NO.. you won't be disappointed...

 

July 8 by CCCCCCCCCC (15820 found)

The cache log was at the MidWestGeoBash where I signed it. I was not the party that brought it to the bash so you'll have to ask that person. Since i did sign the offical log, does this count??? Just curious.

That is disappointing ! With a huge number of finds like that, it certianly makes you question things.

 

What is the motivation here? It is not like they are being paid by the smiley or anything.

Edited July 12, 2006 by Rupert2

[+TeamRJMK]

(regarding BBB cache logs showing up at the 'Bash) Looked like there was a cacher from AZ who couldn't log the caches because someone took the logs....

 

(edit to remove the name of the cache...)

Edited July 12, 2006 by TeamRJMK

[+Nightcrawler.]

I'm so going to like this thread! Really glad I found it! Here's one of many that appear quite often in the OKC area.

 

July 10 by XXXXXXX X (1586 found)

I was here for the placement. Thanks my love.

 

[This entry was edited by XXXXXXX X on Wednesday, July 12, 2006 at 9:02:45 AM.]

[+Nightcrawler.]

More good ones. All are from the same guy/family.

 

April 3 by Xxxxxxx X (1586 found)

Well, since not too many people have gone after it, we did a maintence check, and I saw it from the car. So, I signed the log while doing the maintence.

 

I really love this one... Owner disables it 5 days after logs that state the owner had it were posted.

 

April 6 by xxxxxxx (701 found)

Cache is MIA. Will replace as soon as possible.

[view this log on a separate page]

 

April 1 by Xxxx~Xx xxx Xxxxxxx x (794 found)

Found it with Mom and Dad.SLTNLN TFTC

[view this log on a separate page]

 

April 1 by Xxxxxxxx X (802 found)

Neat little area here, wish they would do things like this in Oklahoma. SLTNLN TFTC

Find#279

[view this log on a separate page]

 

April 1 by Xxxxxxx X (1586 found)

It so well hidden in it's owner's hand as he was replacing it. TFTC

 

You gotta love this guy and his family. They're so blatent about thier false finds! Here's another good one...

 

March 23 by Xxxxxxx X (1586 found)

Since I was here to place the cache, I could not claim FTF, so I came here today to check on the cache on a maintance check and to claim it. It was in the place where we placed it. TFTC

[+briansnat]

ou gotta love this guy and his family. They're so blatent about thier false finds! Here's another good one...

 

Well they're not exactly false finds. At least the guy is finding caches. Sure its a bit cheesy to log finds for caches that you helped hide, but that's a whole 'nother thread.

[+Darkmoon]

Gotta love this one

 

 

March 11 by xxxxxxxxxxxx (802 found)

Looks like I will be the last entry for this poor little micro since the trees are gone that it once was in, but my love said since I helped look for it I can log it as a find. I hate to see this one go but it has to. S The virtual log and said good bye. TFTC

[FallenFaery]

I'm so going to like this thread! Really glad I found it! Here's one of many that appear quite often in the OKC area.

 

 

Welcome. Looking forward to your contributions. !

[+ajayhawkfan]

"The old one is under lots of water.

Placed a temp for you at N 37 48.428 W 096 17.332" he claimed a find.

 

The cache was not underwater and was easily found later that day. Later the same day he he could not find another cache so he put another out, signed it and claimed a find.

 

I came to find out that person has a history of placing a cache when he can't find one. He had never logged a DNF and has almost 1000 "finds".

Edited July 13, 2006 by ajayhawkfan

[+Criminal]

July 13 by XXXXX (128 found)

This one has been on my list for a while. Decided to get it today. Found it came back to log it and it was gone! Well I found the page!

Thanks for the cache.

<ARCHIVE> July 6 by CACHEOWNER (450 found)

Cache no longer there.

[view this log on a separate page]

 

The game just got a whole lot easier! Find the cache page and log it as found. Why bother leaving the house?

[+TeamBarstool]

July 4 by TeamBarstool (25 found)

TeamBarstool is honored to post the 1st DNF for this one.

Not into FTF's but when one pops up less than a mile from home you got to go for it.

Got there about 10 mins after the e-mail. Then the GPSr died. went home for batteries.Came back and found someone else there talking to a GPSr. I got to meet xxxxxxxxxx xxx. We searched around a bit then I gave up.

Waited a few hours until it was even hotter out. Brought another pair of eyes and was still defeated.

 

 

I"m new but I guess I'll never get the big numbers if I keep this up