Jump to content

Revisiting A Cache To Get A Travel Bug - Is It Ok?


Schlaggo

Recommended Posts

It is perfectly OK. Travel bugs are a different game that operates in parallel with geocaching. They aren't trade items either -- you don't need to leave anything when you pick one up.

 

Edited to say:

 

Oh yes, log a Note. I assume you know not to log a second find.

Edited by Thot
Link to comment
Nope, it's okay, you can do that. Lots of folks do, just remember to log a note for the cache when you do. :mad:

Actually, you must be sure to log a note (retrieve) ON THE TRAVEL BUG PAGE!

As long as you do this, it doesn't matter one way or another if you leave a note on the cache page, but most people do.

Playing "Travel Bugs" can be so much fun that you don't have to ever visit a new cache again! You can pick up a bug from a cache you've already found and drop it off in another one you've already found. Sure, this is a little extreme, but I just want to emphasize what otheres have said about it being a different game! :mad:

Link to comment

Yes, it is OK. I did this early on, right when I started Geocaching. TB owners will often send you e-mails of encouragement if you help the TBs with their goals.

 

If I'm caching alone, I always post a note on GC.com and also write something in the log book if I'm picking up or dropping off a TB at a cache I've already visited before.

 

You can use the "Write Note" option to drop off TBs the same way as when you post a "Found It" log, in case you didn't know.

Edited by budd-rdc
Link to comment
I always . . . write something in the log book if I'm picking up or dropping off a TB at a cache I've already visited before.

For some reason, I'm under the impression you're supposed to log your visit in the log book any time you visit a cache. Is this correct or not?

Link to comment
I always . . . write something in the log book if I'm picking up or dropping off a TB at a cache I've already visited before.

For some reason, I'm under the impression you're supposed to log your visit in the log book any time you visit a cache. Is this correct or not?

Some people don't - that's why I emphasized it.

 

But yes, you are correct, you should be logging every one of the visits.

Link to comment

The main reason I WOULD write it on the log is so that someone else who gets there after you but before you have a chance to log it online will know it has been taken and by whom. It can help with confusion and worry that the bug has gone missing. It wouldn't be mandatory but I feel it would be a nice thing to do.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...