+Jamie Z Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 It seems (after reading several threads devoted to the subject) that there are a fair number of people (myself included) that would like to see cache hunters be a little more accurate about logging finds or no finds. I think most of us don't sweat it too much when we see a when the log clearly states that the cache wasn't found, but I think we'd like this type of thing minimized. It seems there may be some confusion on the Log your visit page. Therefore, I am proposing the following minor changes: Change the Found it! radio button to read Found the cache! Change the Couldn't find it! radio button to Did not find the cache! I think this would eliminate some of the confusion about what it is referring to... Some people seem to think it means the place where they thought the cache was hidden. Also, I think a slight rewording for the logs might help remove the stigma that seems to go with it. Jamie Link to comment
+Jamie Z Posted July 22, 2002 Author Share Posted July 22, 2002 Then it's unanimous! Jamie Link to comment
+pater47 Posted July 23, 2002 Share Posted July 23, 2002 I think a lot of people use the 'found it', not paying any attention to what it stands for in a post. They just use the smiley face 'cause they had a good time. Ever notice everybody is willing to give THEIR 2 cents worth but only offer a penny for YOUR thoughts? Link to comment
+Jamie Z Posted September 29, 2004 Author Share Posted September 29, 2004 Two years old, but still a good idea, I think. Jamie Link to comment
+norbu Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 Yes, I concur as well, this is an excellent idea, especially given the increasing number of logs like you cite in the initial post. Link to comment
+Moose Mob Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 Me too! I have to agree, some people think "found it" refers to the spot the coordinates poiunt to. I have heard of people who "drive by" and based on the arrow and distance say "it's in that tree" or "under those rocks" and not even stop to confirm. Link to comment
+the hermit crabs Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 Therefore, I am proposing the following minor changes:- Change the Found it! radio button to read Found the cache! - Change the Couldn't find it! radio button to Did not find the cache! Or maybe even: - Change the Found it! radio button to read Found the cache and signed the log! - Change the Couldn't find it! radio button to Did not find the cache, or did not sign the log! Link to comment
+Divine Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 (edited) I've thought about the same thing, and also about having more neutral icons symbolizing founds and DNFs. Some people seem to have problems having frowny faces on their 'My Page'. Edited September 30, 2004 by Divine Link to comment
Jeremy Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 This just seems really silly. Link to comment
+Team GPSaxophone Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 This just seems really silly. Too bad you closed the Abject Silliness thread Link to comment
+Gary and Mary Adventurers Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 I agree with Jeremy. The purpose of the activity is to find the cache, and the rules say log it. It makes little difference how you word it, if people want to add to their finds they will do it the way they want. Jeremy, just leave it be Have a great Adventure Link to comment
+norbu Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 it is silly, but some people just don't seem to get it, and sometimes clearer semantics get them over that. personally, I like very direct labels and signs...like the ones in the UK that say "Danger, you could die" instead of "Danger, high voltage, risk of bodily harm" Link to comment
+Jamie Z Posted September 30, 2004 Author Share Posted September 30, 2004 This just seems really silly. Fair enough. Link to comment
Recommended Posts