Jump to content

Finally! A decent excuse.


Recommended Posts

I've finally found a decent excuse for coordinates being off. It turns out were pretty quick here in Oz we've been moving north by 7cm a year, now scientists needs to re calculate latitude and longitude because it's all off by 1.5 meters since the datum was last redone in 1994.

 

Link to ABC article

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2016-07-28/aust-latitude-longitude-coordinates-out-by-1-5m-scientists/7666858

Link to comment

GPSs aren't accurate to five feet so no adjustment needed

 

While that's true for consumer devices, professional GPS/GNSS equipment used by surveyors is accurate to a centimeter.

 

if you're spend thousands of dollars and hours setting setting it up to find a cache

Link to comment

GPSs aren't accurate to five feet so no adjustment needed

There's a decent chance that I may be going to Australia by way of Aukland next June. I would prefer that the coordinates for the runway I'll be landing on aren't off by even as little as five feet.

If the pilot is so dependant on GPS accuracy that a horizontal difference of a few feet will cause problems for a 100+ x 100+ foot aircraft travelling at 250 feet per second and landing on a 10000 foot runway, I'd look for a different airline! :laughing:

Link to comment

And as I already noted in the related thread about the same issue, it has no effect on caching. Yes, in Australia your gpsr will be 1.5 meters off. BUT THE CO'S GPSR WAS ALSO 1.5 METERS OFF WHEN HE PLACED THE CACHE!

 

The Australian tectonic plate is moving at 7 cm per year (NW, I believe). The trivial adjustment is therefore not 1.5 meters, but the number of years between cache placement and search, times 7 cm. An adjustment of, say, 21 cm (less than a foot) can be ignored in caching.

 

However, sensitive types may get motion sickness in Australia from that tectonic motion. :lol:

Link to comment

GPSs aren't accurate to five feet so no adjustment needed

There's a decent chance that I may be going to Australia by way of Aukland next June. I would prefer that the coordinates for the runway I'll be landing on aren't off by even as little as five feet.

If the pilot is so dependant on GPS accuracy that a horizontal difference of a few feet will cause problems for a 100+ x 100+ foot aircraft travelling at 250 feet per second and landing on a 10000 foot runway, I'd look for a different airline! :laughing:

Day or night, the pilot micro-adjusts landing position by sight. If dense fog or a snowstorm is predicted, reschedule the vacation!

Link to comment

I'm pretty sure that true zero-visibility landings are still off in the future.

 

It's long been a requirement that pilots be able to see any runway they're about to land on. No runway, no landing. A standard part of pilot lingo is "minimums", whether the airport has enough visibility to safely and legally land. Prang an airplane once, and your career is going nowhere.

 

Heck, if it was really an issue, they'd simply adjust the coords of the runways to account for this.

 

But as an excuse for DNFing a 1/1, heck yeah!

Link to comment

And as I already noted in the related thread about the same issue, it has no effect on caching. Yes, in Australia your gpsr will be 1.5 meters off. BUT THE CO'S GPSR WAS ALSO 1.5 METERS OFF WHEN HE PLACED THE CACHE!

 

The Australian tectonic plate is moving at 7 cm per year (NW, I believe). The trivial adjustment is therefore not 1.5 meters, but the number of years between cache placement and search, times 7 cm. An adjustment of, say, 21 cm (less than a foot) can be ignored in caching.

 

However, sensitive types may get motion sickness in Australia from that tectonic motion. :lol:

 

To be more precise, in Australia the gpsr isn't "off," it just differs from published prior (previously-accurate!) GPS coords for a fixed location (including caches). The older the reading for the location, the more it will differ from a current reading. In one year an exact point there changes by 7 cm, as seen from the satellite and with respect to the world as a whole. At that rate cache coords published today will be off by 7 meters (25 feet) in 100 years. No worries - plenty of time to correct!

Edited by wmpastor
Link to comment

GPSs aren't accurate to five feet so no adjustment needed

 

There's a decent chance that I may be going to Australia by way of Aukland next June. I would prefer that the coordinates for the runway I'll be landing on aren't off by even as little as five feet.

 

the pilot doesn't care. he has charts that he can use to navigate to anywhere in the world in his iPad/iPhone.

 

all he(or she) needs is fuel and line of sight.

Link to comment

GPSs aren't accurate to five feet so no adjustment needed

 

There's a decent chance that I may be going to Australia by way of Aukland next June. I would prefer that the coordinates for the runway I'll be landing on aren't off by even as little as five feet.

 

the pilot doesn't care. he has charts that he can use to navigate to anywhere in the world in his iPad/iPhone.

 

all he(or she) needs is fuel and line of sight.

 

My post was mostly a joke to point out that lat/long coordinates aren't used just for geocaching.

Link to comment

Book me on the flight with the left-brained pilot using Samsung / Android, please!

 

Not approved yet. Only Ipad.

 

As for the Australian drift, there's also a drift of the magnetic north. Our local (EBBR) 2/20 runway was renamed 1/19 last year. Most used 25R is still 25R.

Link to comment

Book me on the flight with the left-brained pilot using Samsung / Android, please!

 

Not approved yet. Only Ipad.

 

As for the Australian drift, there's also a drift of the magnetic north. Our local (EBBR) 2/20 runway was renamed 1/19 last year. Most used 25R is still 25R.

To update the Greek philosopher's 2,000-year-old wisdom, "A pilot cannot land on the same runway twice, because he/she is not the same person, and it is not the same runway."

Link to comment

Book me on the flight with the left-brained pilot using Samsung / Android, please!

 

Not approved yet. Only Ipad.

 

As for the Australian drift, there's also a drift of the magnetic north. Our local (EBBR) 2/20 runway was renamed 1/19 last year. Most used 25R is still 25R.

 

Sounds like the continent is not only moving north, but it's doing the twist as well! Is this the real reason that water drains counterclockwise?

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...