+ibycus Posted April 6, 2005 Share Posted April 6, 2005 Just wondering if a cache will still be archived because of lots of logs? Recently a very popular local cache hit 1000 logs. The owner of the cache was worried that the cache would be archived so he went through and deleted all the notes on the cache. Is this still an issue? Link to comment
Jeremy Posted April 6, 2005 Share Posted April 6, 2005 Not for genuine caches it isn't an issue. We're also working on ways to make it less of an issue. The locationless caches are the biggest problem since they go into the 4,000+ logs area. Link to comment
+ibycus Posted April 6, 2005 Author Share Posted April 6, 2005 Its a virtual moving cache. Kind of like benchmark hunting for us up here in Alberta. Link to comment
Jeremy Posted April 6, 2005 Share Posted April 6, 2005 I'd need to see the cache. Other projects like the replacement for locationless caches are probably a better fit for this concept. Link to comment
+ibycus Posted April 6, 2005 Author Share Posted April 6, 2005 Here ya go: Brass Caps Link to comment
Jeremy Posted April 6, 2005 Share Posted April 6, 2005 Ah. One of the grandfathered moving caches. Just leave it as-is. No need to delete logs. Link to comment
Recommended Posts