Jump to content

Is this valid ?


Ibar

Recommended Posts

Today I stumbled upon a tradi cache: GC4M6WH with the followig description (rranslated from Dutch)

 

"The cache is regularly stolen (last maintenance dates from 8th April). SO I HAVE GLUED THE STASH AS WELL AS THE COVER, SO IT CAN ONLY BE LOGGED ONLINE"

 

Isn't this against the rules of the games? I just wonder <_<

Link to comment

Today I stumbled upon a tradi cache: GC4M6WH with the followig description (rranslated from Dutch)

 

"The cache is regularly stolen (last maintenance dates from 8th April). SO I HAVE GLUED THE STASH AS WELL AS THE COVER, SO IT CAN ONLY BE LOGGED ONLINE"

 

Isn't this against the rules of the games? I just wonder <_<

 

This isn't allowed, a cache without a logbook/paper is a virtual cache and these aren't allowed anymore (except for the grandfathered ones). The cache should be archived, so you can write a "needs archived" log if you are sure there is nothing to log anymore. In my opinion the cache should be archived anyway, since it's clearly not a good safe place for a cache since it has been stolen several times now.

Link to comment

Today I stumbled upon a tradi cache: GC4M6WH with the followig description (rranslated from Dutch)

 

"The cache is regularly stolen (last maintenance dates from 8th April). SO I HAVE GLUED THE STASH AS WELL AS THE COVER, SO IT CAN ONLY BE LOGGED ONLINE"

 

Isn't this against the rules of the games? I just wonder <_<

Yes.

NA or a note to the Reviewer will take care of all the maintenance problems for him. :)

Link to comment

Today I stumbled upon a tradi cache: GC4M6WH with the followig description (rranslated from Dutch)

 

"The cache is regularly stolen (last maintenance dates from 8th April). SO I HAVE GLUED THE STASH AS WELL AS THE COVER, SO IT CAN ONLY BE LOGGED ONLINE"

 

Isn't this against the rules of the games? I just wonder <_<

You could take a magic marker and sign the container.... :anitongue:

Link to comment

Waw, they were fast. It seems that the reviewer is either reading this forum or constantly checking logs, as I didn't approach him directly. In any case good to know our reviewer community is so proactive, that can just improve the quality of the game :)

Link to comment

Waw, they were fast. It seems that the reviewer is either reading this forum or constantly checking logs, as I didn't approach him directly. In any case good to know our reviewer community is so proactive, that can just improve the quality of the game :)

There are a number of reviewers that frequent the forums, and they've been known to pass along information like this to other reviewers. I'd wager that's what happened here.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...