+geognerd Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Hmm, just went onto geocaching.com to look at some caches without logging in first. Underneath the cache name, it says "You must be logged in to view the Location Information for this Cache. It's free!" I wonder if this is an attempt to prevent muggles from looking up coordinates and then going out to trash a cache. But then again they could just sign up for a free account or download the .loc file and get the coordinates anyway. Link to comment
+Renegade Knight Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 That's a good step in the right direction. It used to be anyone can look up a cache without any kind of account. It also gurantees that our local cache maggot has an account now. That's a start. Link to comment
+Teamhawaii1981 & blueicyrose Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 (edited) Was it members only?? I just tried logging out and checking out a couple and I got the descriptions fine... Edit: NEVERMIND, just saw it. Edited October 17, 2005 by Teamhawaii1981 Link to comment
Jeremy Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 That is one benefit, but it has also been designed to combat the increased scraping abuse that we've had on the web site. Link to comment
+geognerd Posted October 17, 2005 Author Share Posted October 17, 2005 Whoa, lots of changes posted by Jeremy here. Link to comment
+Renegade Knight Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Was it members only?? I just tried logging out and checking out a couple and I got the descriptions fine... Edit: NEVERMIND, just saw it. I just did the same. No location info, but the descriptions were there. If I clicked on the LOC file I got a sign in screen. Link to comment
+Teamhawaii1981 & blueicyrose Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Whoa! Those are some awesome changes! Thank you. Link to comment
+fizzymagic Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Whoa, lots of changes posted by Jeremy here. All of which will improve the site functionality significantly. Thanks, Jeremy! Link to comment
+AO and CC Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 I think the changes are a good thing. Just finished reading them. Link to comment
+popop Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Just tried loading the network kml and got the following message when opening Google Earth. Fetch of NetworkLink "Geocaching Network KML" failed Http: Forbidden Anybody else have this happen? I downloaded the kml to my desktop and then just opened it. Was I supposed to do something more? Glad to see this feature, BTW - great job Jeremy and staff!! Link to comment
Jeremy Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 The network kml floodgates are now open. Link to comment
+Teamhawaii1981 & blueicyrose Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Oh man, the Travel Bug Google Earth Option is awesome! Link to comment
+popop Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Just tried loading the network kml and got the following message when opening Google Earth. Fetch of NetworkLink "Geocaching Network KML" failed Http: Forbidden Works now - whooaaaa, here we goooooooo......... Link to comment
+TotemLake Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Thanks for the updates Jeremy! Link to comment
+AB4N Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Whoa, lots of changes posted by Jeremy here. Bravo! Thank you for all of the excellent upgrades! Link to comment
+Teamhawaii1981 & blueicyrose Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 My computer is hating me right now, I think it is about to explode trying all this stuff out. The fan is sounds like an airplane. Link to comment
Pto Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Am I missing something? I dont see any option to download the kml file from My Account page- I read everything- and didnt see it listed- but is the googleearth/ Kml stuff for premium members only? Link to comment
+DavidMac Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 I really like the changes for the most part. One thing I notice though... the "# users wathcing this cache" is now gone. Maybe I'll just have to get used to the new order of items on the right column of My Cache Page, but for now the list seems to run together into a big list of items that have little in common with each other, other than the fact that they all belong on the My Cache Page. I would reccomend moving My Inventory up in the list and moving the Google features farther down, since I would imagine that the Google links would be used less frequently. Also, where did the list of items awaiting approval go? Does it only appear when I actually have something in the queue? Link to comment
+popop Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Just noticed a user limitation not mentioned (I didn't see it anyway) on the "About Google Earth KML" link on GC.com. It appears you have a daily limit on the number of "views" each day. Each time you scroll you use up a "view". I didn't noticed it until I was down to ONLY 190 views left today! For the average user 200 or so "views" per day will be more than adequate. However, if you're worried about the limit you should just uncheck the GE folder called Geocache Name while scrolling and zooming into your area of interest, then turning it back on once you're ready. Link to comment
+Teamhawaii1981 & blueicyrose Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 I really like the changes for the most part. One thing I notice though... the "# users wathcing this cache" is now gone. On the pages I checked out it still says "you are 1 of x users watching this cache" Link to comment
+DavidMac Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 One more question: I really like the new section below the TB list on cache pages that shows all bookmark lists that a given cache appears in. Great way to tell if I've already bookmarked a listing and if so, what list(s) it's in. But I notice that "by DavidMac" appears below each bookmark listed in the column. Will this section only show my bookmarks, or will it show other members' bookmark lists that the cache appears in? If it only shows my bookmarks, then I'm not sure the "by..." line is really necessary as it takes up extra space. Link to comment
+DavidMac Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 I really like the changes for the most part. One thing I notice though... the "# users wathcing this cache" is now gone. On the pages I checked out it still says "you are 1 of x users watching this cache" You're right. I went back, refreshed the page, and it showed up. Must have caught it just at the wrong moment. Link to comment
+GrizzlyJohn Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 (edited) Saw that one of the changes noted was, "Updated max number of pocket queries to 40." That is a good thing. Thank You. But when I went to the PQ page it still said the max was 20. That probably needs updating. Edited October 17, 2005 by GrizzlyJohn Link to comment
+Byron & Anne Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Ya Awsome changes. The not being able to see coords without logging in is a big FAT PAIN IN THE BUTT. If automatic log in worked it might not be so bad. Link to comment
+Car54 Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 One more question: I really like the new section below the TB list on cache pages that shows all bookmark lists that a given cache appears in. Great way to tell if I've already bookmarked a listing and if so, what list(s) it's in. But I notice that "by DavidMac" appears below each bookmark listed in the column. Will this section only show my bookmarks, or will it show other members' bookmark lists that the cache appears in? If it only shows my bookmarks, then I'm not sure the "by..." line is really necessary as it takes up extra space. I'm really hoping that the "by" portion doesn't show up for anyone other than the owner of the bookmark list, unless, of course, they've opened it up for sharing. So far we have only 1 cache on our ignore list and when I visit that cache page it shows that it is on our bookmark list named "Ignore". I wouldn't want the cache owner to see that. We've ignored for a personal preference reason, not something that the owner would really need to know. Mrs. Car54 Link to comment
+wimseyguy Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Ya Awsome changes. The not being able to see coords without logging in is a big FAT PAIN IN THE BUTT. If automatic log in worked it might not be so bad. Do you have your machine set up to accept cookies from gc.com? Do you have the 'remember me' box checked? I never have to log in, unless I have cleared out my cookie box. Link to comment
+Isonzo Karst Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Great changes to the bookmark lists. I've changed all of mine to shared and public. Having that link right on the cache page should really help folks find the lists. And being able to PQ them too! neat. Link to comment
+DavidMac Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 (edited) I'm really hoping that the "by" portion doesn't show up for anyone other than the owner of the bookmark list, unless, of course, they've opened it up for sharing. So far we have only 1 cache on our ignore list and when I visit that cache page it shows that it is on our bookmark list named "Ignore". I wouldn't want the cache owner to see that. We've ignored for a personal preference reason, not something that the owner would really need to know. Mrs. Car54 After logging out, the bookmark section disappears from the page altogether. I have yet to see another user's bookmark list appear in the list, even on a few very popular caches, so my guess is that it only shows your lists to you when you are logged in. I'm at work right now and don't have the password to another account with me (our club account, not a sockpuppet ), so I can't log in under another username to see what happens. Edited October 17, 2005 by DavidMac Link to comment
Clan Riffster Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Wow! Absolutely kewl! This is one of the mony reasons GC outshines the competition. Hats off to Jeremy & crew! Link to comment
+Tharagleb Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Thanks Jeremy et al, the new changes are great. But my boss came in *right* when I was on Google Earth checking out caches. Link to comment
+Raine Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Yah.. I get caught all the time Link to comment
+GSVNoFixedAbode Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 Yah.. I get caught all the time Link to comment
+The Leprechauns Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 (edited) I'm really hoping that the "by" portion doesn't show up for anyone other than the owner of the bookmark list, unless, of course, they've opened it up for sharing. So far we have only 1 cache on our ignore list and when I visit that cache page it shows that it is on our bookmark list named "Ignore". I wouldn't want the cache owner to see that. We've ignored for a personal preference reason, not something that the owner would really need to know. Mrs. Car54 After logging out, the bookmark section disappears from the page altogether. I have yet to see another user's bookmark list appear in the list, even on a few very popular caches, so my guess is that it only shows your lists to you when you are logged in. I'm at work right now and don't have the password to another account with me (our club account, not a sockpuppet ), so I can't log in under another username to see what happens. To see the new feature in its full glory, click on the link in my tagline below for "The Leprechauns' Top 5% Greatest Cache Hunts." I have made this a "public" and "shared" list, so that everyone can see the caches which appear on the list. So, click on a few of the caches I've featured. A good example is the Ebey Bluffs cache, which also appears on the "Best Caches" list of several other geocachers. After three bookmark lists, you'll see a link to a page that includes all of the lists mentioning the cache. The lists with the highest user ratings are listed first. EDIT: Following my own advice, I clicked on the Ebey Bluffs "more bookmarks" link and I am seeing a list of bookmark lists that have NOT been coded as public (because other caches that appear on those same lists do NOT contain links to those bookmark lists). That is a bad thing. Edited October 18, 2005 by The Leprechauns Link to comment
+wvcoalcat Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 I was at work yesterday with my account page open watching to see if my newest cache subission had been published. Hit refresh and said "what the heck" when it came up in the new format. Looks good and I like the additions. Thanks. Link to comment
Mr.Yuck Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 That is one benefit, but it has also been designed to combat the increased scraping abuse that we've had on the web site. This is my favorite new feature, coords and maps only available to logged in members. I see the intention of this fix wasn't the issue I've always had, but trust me, there are thousands of befuddled knuckleheads out there today who just look caches up on the internet, find them, and only sign the logbooks, never log online. There are loads of these people in my area. For example, I have a cache only listed on Navicache, which had only four logged finders. But on my last maintenance visit a couple of weeks ago, there were three additional finders in the paper log. These non-online loggers contribute nothing to the hobby, as they never hide caches for others to find, and they are usually behind missing TB's. Of course they can just create an account, and only use if for the purpose of looking up caches Link to comment
Mr.Yuck Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 One more question: I really like the new section below the TB list on cache pages that shows all bookmark lists that a given cache appears in. Great way to tell if I've already bookmarked a listing and if so, what list(s) it's in. But I notice that "by DavidMac" appears below each bookmark listed in the column. Will this section only show my bookmarks, or will it show other members' bookmark lists that the cache appears in? If it only shows my bookmarks, then I'm not sure the "by..." line is really necessary as it takes up extra space. I'm really hoping that the "by" portion doesn't show up for anyone other than the owner of the bookmark list, unless, of course, they've opened it up for sharing. So far we have only 1 cache on our ignore list and when I visit that cache page it shows that it is on our bookmark list named "Ignore". I wouldn't want the cache owner to see that. We've ignored for a personal preference reason, not something that the owner would really need to know. Mrs. Car54 My ignore list (aka lame micro list) is simply not a "shared" bookmark list. Link to comment
Mr.Yuck Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 I'm really hoping that the "by" portion doesn't show up for anyone other than the owner of the bookmark list, unless, of course, they've opened it up for sharing. So far we have only 1 cache on our ignore list and when I visit that cache page it shows that it is on our bookmark list named "Ignore". I wouldn't want the cache owner to see that. We've ignored for a personal preference reason, not something that the owner would really need to know. Mrs. Car54 After logging out, the bookmark section disappears from the page altogether. I have yet to see another user's bookmark list appear in the list, even on a few very popular caches, so my guess is that it only shows your lists to you when you are logged in. I'm at work right now and don't have the password to another account with me (our club account, not a sockpuppet ), so I can't log in under another username to see what happens. To see the new feature in its full glory, click on the link in my tagline below for "The Leprechauns' Top 5% Greatest Cache Hunts." I have made this a "public" and "shared" list, so that everyone can see the caches which appear on the list. So, click on a few of the caches I've featured. A good example is the Ebey Bluffs cache, which also appears on the "Best Caches" list of several other geocachers. After three bookmark lists, you'll see a link to a page that includes all of the lists mentioning the cache. The lists with the highest user ratings are listed first. EDIT: Following my own advice, I clicked on the Ebey Bluffs "more bookmarks" link and I am seeing a list of bookmark lists that have NOT been coded as public (because other caches that appear on those same lists do NOT contain links to those bookmark lists). That is a bad thing. Fear not! I saw my "not shared" ignore list showing up on a cache listing while I was logged in. But then I quickly logged out, and logged in with a sock puppet account (yes, I suppose that's a public admission of having a sock puppet account; it's for a mascot, give me a break). Anyways, TheWhiteUrkel's not shared ignore list was not seen by another logged in user. Link to comment
+Tharagleb Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 How to abuse your (public & shared) bookmark lists: - My bottom 10 caches - My solved puzzle caches, annotated with coords. Link to comment
+The Leprechauns Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 How to abuse your (public & shared) bookmark lists: - My bottom 10 caches - My solved puzzle caches, annotated with coords. Yep, I believe it is only a matter of time before we see this new feature abused, as others have been abused. Instead of seeing links to "nice" bookmark lists like "The Leprechauns' Top 5% Greatest Cache Hunts," we will see what you described. The only solution I can think of is to rate the "good" lists "thumbs-up" and to downgrade the "bad" lists. I understand from TPTB that the "good" lists will be listed first on the cache page, perhaps then relegating the "bad" bookmark lists to a separate page after the three-list maximum is hit. Link to comment
CoyoteRed Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 Hey! What's wrong with a "Sissy-n-CR's Must Miss Cache List" and why is that "abuse?" ... Actually, I started this post being facetious, but then I saw the irony of the encouraging of folks to vote down lists that point out those caches that one might thoroughly not enjoy. Kind of like censuring the censurers. Link to comment
+Moose Mob Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 How to abuse your (public & shared) bookmark lists: - My bottom 10 caches - My solved puzzle caches, annotated with coords. Yep, I believe it is only a matter of time before we see this new feature abused, as others have been abused. Instead of seeing links to "nice" bookmark lists like "The Leprechauns' Top 5% Greatest Cache Hunts," we will see what you described. The only solution I can think of is to rate the "good" lists "thumbs-up" and to downgrade the "bad" lists. I understand from TPTB that the "good" lists will be listed first on the cache page, perhaps then relegating the "bad" bookmark lists to a separate page after the three-list maximum is hit. The question asked is "Do you find this list useful?", so many folks may say "Ye, I know what caches to avoid" or "Yes, I could have solved those puzzles without the hints in this list" So it may rise to the top. On the flip side, as I noticed with waymarks, people will readily rate something down they did not like, but don't always consider to rate somethig up that they enjoyed. Link to comment
+Tharagleb Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 (edited) Hey! What's wrong with a "Sissy-n-CR's Must Miss Cache List" and why is that "abuse?" ... Actually, I started this post being facetious, but then I saw the irony of the encouraging of folks to vote down lists that point out those caches that one might thoroughly not enjoy. Kind of like censuring the censurers. There is nothing wrong with a must-miss cache list, except all the contention it would create. I was originally thinking about "Tharagleb's caches that suck.", but decided to tone it down... [Edit: thing ==> thinking] Edited October 18, 2005 by Tharagleb Link to comment
markandlynn Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 What it requires is a report this bookmark list button then someone knows it needs to be looked at of course we may get markandlynn's DPM bookmark list to hide its true meaning..... Link to comment
CoyoteRed Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 There is nothing wrong with a must-miss cache list, except all the contention it would create. Agreed. I'd probably not do it just so the sucky caches don't get the attention. You know, kind of like a train wreck or rubber neckers. "Hey, let's go see what was so bad about that cache CR said sucked." Link to comment
+The Leprechauns Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 I'm really hoping that the "by" portion doesn't show up for anyone other than the owner of the bookmark list, unless, of course, they've opened it up for sharing. So far we have only 1 cache on our ignore list and when I visit that cache page it shows that it is on our bookmark list named "Ignore". I wouldn't want the cache owner to see that. We've ignored for a personal preference reason, not something that the owner would really need to know. Mrs. Car54 After logging out, the bookmark section disappears from the page altogether. I have yet to see another user's bookmark list appear in the list, even on a few very popular caches, so my guess is that it only shows your lists to you when you are logged in. I'm at work right now and don't have the password to another account with me (our club account, not a sockpuppet ), so I can't log in under another username to see what happens. To see the new feature in its full glory, click on the link in my tagline below for "The Leprechauns' Top 5% Greatest Cache Hunts." I have made this a "public" and "shared" list, so that everyone can see the caches which appear on the list. So, click on a few of the caches I've featured. A good example is the Ebey Bluffs cache, which also appears on the "Best Caches" list of several other geocachers. After three bookmark lists, you'll see a link to a page that includes all of the lists mentioning the cache. The lists with the highest user ratings are listed first. EDIT: Following my own advice, I clicked on the Ebey Bluffs "more bookmarks" link and I am seeing a list of bookmark lists that have NOT been coded as public (because other caches that appear on those same lists do NOT contain links to those bookmark lists). That is a bad thing. Fear not! I saw my "not shared" ignore list showing up on a cache listing while I was logged in. But then I quickly logged out, and logged in with a sock puppet account (yes, I suppose that's a public admission of having a sock puppet account; it's for a mascot, give me a break). Anyways, TheWhiteUrkel's not shared ignore list was not seen by another logged in user. No, I am still "fearing." Take a look at this page of bookmark lists which include the popular "Ebey Bluffs" cache on Whidbey Island, Washington. You will see several lists that are NOT coded as being "shared," and which are NOT coded as being "public." This is a bug. Link to comment
+Teamhawaii1981 & blueicyrose Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 I'm really hoping that the "by" portion doesn't show up for anyone other than the owner of the bookmark list, unless, of course, they've opened it up for sharing. So far we have only 1 cache on our ignore list and when I visit that cache page it shows that it is on our bookmark list named "Ignore". I wouldn't want the cache owner to see that. We've ignored for a personal preference reason, not something that the owner would really need to know. Mrs. Car54 After logging out, the bookmark section disappears from the page altogether. I have yet to see another user's bookmark list appear in the list, even on a few very popular caches, so my guess is that it only shows your lists to you when you are logged in. I'm at work right now and don't have the password to another account with me (our club account, not a sockpuppet ), so I can't log in under another username to see what happens. To see the new feature in its full glory, click on the link in my tagline below for "The Leprechauns' Top 5% Greatest Cache Hunts." I have made this a "public" and "shared" list, so that everyone can see the caches which appear on the list. So, click on a few of the caches I've featured. A good example is the Ebey Bluffs cache, which also appears on the "Best Caches" list of several other geocachers. After three bookmark lists, you'll see a link to a page that includes all of the lists mentioning the cache. The lists with the highest user ratings are listed first. EDIT: Following my own advice, I clicked on the Ebey Bluffs "more bookmarks" link and I am seeing a list of bookmark lists that have NOT been coded as public (because other caches that appear on those same lists do NOT contain links to those bookmark lists). That is a bad thing. Fear not! I saw my "not shared" ignore list showing up on a cache listing while I was logged in. But then I quickly logged out, and logged in with a sock puppet account (yes, I suppose that's a public admission of having a sock puppet account; it's for a mascot, give me a break). Anyways, TheWhiteUrkel's not shared ignore list was not seen by another logged in user. No, I am still "fearing." Take a look at this page of bookmark lists which include the popular "Ebey Bluffs" cache on Whidbey Island, Washington. You will see several lists that are NOT coded as being "shared," and which are NOT coded as being "public." This is a bug. That particular list only lists them as shared, only the cache owner can see whether they are public on their own pages. I tried this out too. I made some of my lists shares, some public and shared, and some just public. On that particular listing page it just has a column for "shared" and obviously those all are. If there were a column for "public" I am sure all those would say "YES" as well. This, I doubt it a bug, maybe a failure to update the way bookmarks are listed on those lists, but not a bug. BTW, added that cache to my list of "To Do's; but will probably never get a chance!" Link to comment
+mini cacher Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 That is one benefit, but it has also been designed to combat the increased scraping abuse that we've had on the web site. So I guess that limits the scraping to only those scrapers that can handle cookies. Link to comment
+The Leprechauns Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 (edited) To TeamHawaii (sorry, there are multiple discussions going on in this thread): But the list includes several bookmark lists where the answer is "NO" in the shared column. If I choose not to share my list then it should not show up on the list of bookmark lists, even if people cannot access the list itself. If I have a list of the 100 lamest caches I've ever done, but SOLELY for my own reference, I would not want the public (and especially the cache owners) to know that "Interstate Exit Guardrail #38" is on that bookmark list. Edited October 18, 2005 by The Leprechauns Link to comment
+WildGooseChase Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 (edited) Snipped other quotes. No, I am still "fearing." Take a look at this page of bookmark lists which include the popular "Ebey Bluffs" cache on Whidbey Island, Washington. You will see several lists that are NOT coded as being "shared," and which are NOT coded as being "public." This is a bug. When you click the "more" Bookmark Lists link on the cache page it shows all the shared bookmarks, even those not keyed as public. Edited October 18, 2005 by WildGooseChase Link to comment
Jeremy Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 But the list includes several bookmark lists where the answer is "NO" in the shared column. Yes, but only for you because you have some administrator rights on the site. Regular users can't see them. I verified with my Jeremy account (which sadly, has no rights at all). Link to comment
Recommended Posts