Zop, on Sep 16 2008, 03:20 PM, said:
Taoiseach, on Sep 16 2008, 11:06 AM, said:
What if it's organised as some sort of community effort to maintain the caches that are being ignored?
I like the enthusiasm but if a cache is being ignored by the placer, it should be archived and CITO.
Then someone can place a new hide that will be maintained and lure more visitors
I found this information in the FAQ section regarding reporting a missing cach:
What do I do if I find out that a cache has gone missing?
If you visit a cache location and the cache is missing, make sure to log the cache as one that you "Did Not Find" so the cache owner is notified. Cache owners who repeatedly receive "Did Not Find" logs should check to see that their cache has not been removed. As a geocacher, if you notice that a cache detail page has an unusual number of "Did Not Find" logs, please let the local reviewer know or contact us. We rely on the geocaching community to let us know the status of caches in their area.
______________________________________________________________
I guess the Local Reviewer is the reviewer that approved that cache initially.
Another question possed by Cherokee Bill, "How many DNF's do you need before you report it?".
I would say probably 2 or 3 DNF's by different cachers on different dates. I have noticed two DNF's on the same day by different cachers, no doubt traveling together.
And if the owner hasn't responded to the Maint. requests after a month if should be archived. I am sure the Reviewers have guidelines.
P.S. How Bout them Cowboys!!!!!!
This post has been edited by dougshep: 16 September 2008 - 04:11 PM