Groundspeak Forums: Geocaching.com site update September 15th 2011 - Groundspeak Forums

Jump to content

  • (6 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

Geocaching.com site update September 15th 2011

#251 User is offline   jellis 

  • Just keepin it fair and fun
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1909
  • Joined: 08-May 06

Posted 20 September 2011 - 12:57 PM

If there is a log I can see it. But what I was hoping for is the images still linked to the cache page itself. Example you see in someone's gallery a great waterfall. You click the image and NOTHING. you see the image but not the cache page, so you still don't know what cache the picture was taken from.
If it has changed then I must be missing something.

#252 User is offline   jellis 

  • Just keepin it fair and fun
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1909
  • Joined: 08-May 06

Posted 20 September 2011 - 12:57 PM

If there is a log I can see it. But what I was hoping for is the images still linked to the cache page itself. Example you see in someone's gallery a great waterfall. You click the image and NOTHING. you see the image but not the cache page, so you still don't know what cache the picture was taken from.
If it has changed then I must be missing something.

#253 User is offline   DanPan 

  • Come and visit www.Geocaching.BE
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 332
  • Joined: 12-September 04

Posted 20 September 2011 - 01:04 PM

View Postjellis, on 20 September 2011 - 12:57 PM, said:

If there is a log I can see it. But what I was hoping for is the images still linked to the cache page itself. Example you see in someone's gallery a great waterfall. You click the image and NOTHING. you see the image but not the cache page, so you still don't know what cache the picture was taken from.
If it has changed then I must be missing something.
At the bottom of the image there should be 2 links "View log" "Print Picture".
If you do not see the link, disable greasemonkey.

#254 User is offline   knowschad 

  • Charter Nobody
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 17421
  • Joined: 20-May 05

Posted 20 September 2011 - 02:24 PM

View PostFrank Broughton, on 20 September 2011 - 12:44 PM, said:

It works for me. I asked them to mess it up for you, because you picked on me in that voting comment.... Don't mess with me - I have pull! :P
You noticed that, huh? :ph34r:

#255 User is offline   GOF and Bacall 

  • Geocacher
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 6679
  • Joined: 24-September 06

Posted 20 September 2011 - 04:03 PM

Thanks guys for the fixes.

Maybe the answer is to take smaller smaller steps and just fix or add one or two things at a time? Seems to work better than the big monthly releases.

#256 User is online   jholly 

  • I like the smell of a cache in the morning
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 7043
  • Joined: 16-August 02

Posted 20 September 2011 - 04:18 PM

View PostGOF and Bacall, on 20 September 2011 - 04:03 PM, said:

Thanks guys for the fixes.

Maybe the answer is to take smaller smaller steps and just fix or add one or two things at a time? Seems to work better than the big monthly releases.

I would agree to some extent. But the thing that seems missing to me is the developers do not take the time to document the changes they are going to make, along with the resources touched and used and have this go through a peer review. This is not for public release and management is not welcomed at the peer review. Once they make the code changes a peer review of the code changes should also be done. I think most of the oh dears we have been experiencing is because of the lack of review. It seems like no one said "but that is the way it works now and this change changes that behavior". I did that for the 20 some years I was doing software development and it was extremely helpful in getting a more bug free product out the door. So many of the little glitches we have had the last few releases I just shake my head and mumble "well that was never reviewed". And yes, it takes time so forget the biweekly bug release or even a monthly release. I would be quite happy with a release every 6 to 8 weeks that addresses some of the outstanding requests on Don_J's list and the release does not break or regress the features and then the need for a couple hotfixes to get it working again.

#257 User is offline   Frank Broughton 

  • Buffalo, NY - All About Nothing Still
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1142
  • Joined: 25-August 07

Posted 20 September 2011 - 09:07 PM

View Postknowschad, on 20 September 2011 - 02:24 PM, said:

View PostFrank Broughton, on 20 September 2011 - 12:44 PM, said:

It works for me. I asked them to mess it up for you, because you picked on me in that voting comment.... Don't mess with me - I have pull! :P
You noticed that, huh? :ph34r:


haha yeppers I did!

#258 User is offline   aka Momster 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 383
  • Joined: 18-January 08

Posted 20 September 2011 - 10:39 PM

View PostDanPan, on 20 September 2011 - 01:04 PM, said:

View Postjellis, on 20 September 2011 - 12:57 PM, said:

If there is a log I can see it. But what I was hoping for is the images still linked to the cache page itself. Example you see in someone's gallery a great waterfall. You click the image and NOTHING. you see the image but not the cache page, so you still don't know what cache the picture was taken from.
If it has changed then I must be missing something.
At the bottom of the image there should be 2 links "View log" "Print Picture".
If you do not see the link, disable greasemonkey.


I have noticed that if the photo in the geocacher's gallery is for a trackable, rather than a geocache, it will not have the "View Log" link when you click to see the photo. It would be nice if they would add the link for those photos, too.

#259 User is offline   Don_J 

  • Chatsworth, CA - The view is the treasure!
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 3622
  • Joined: 08-May 05

Posted 21 September 2011 - 01:38 AM

View Postaka Momster, on 20 September 2011 - 10:39 PM, said:

View PostDanPan, on 20 September 2011 - 01:04 PM, said:

View Postjellis, on 20 September 2011 - 12:57 PM, said:

If there is a log I can see it. But what I was hoping for is the images still linked to the cache page itself. Example you see in someone's gallery a great waterfall. You click the image and NOTHING. you see the image but not the cache page, so you still don't know what cache the picture was taken from.
If it has changed then I must be missing something.
At the bottom of the image there should be 2 links "View log" "Print Picture".
If you do not see the link, disable greasemonkey.


I have noticed that if the photo in the geocacher's gallery is for a trackable, rather than a geocache, it will not have the "View Log" link when you click to see the photo. It would be nice if they would add the link for those photos, too.


And, I have noticed that if I am viewing my gallery, through my public profile, I do not see images that I have attached directly to my cache listings. Can anyone confirm if they were always absent, or did they get lost in the shuffle?

#260 User is offline   JJnTJ 

  • People here are friendly and content
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 263
  • Joined: 18-August 10

Posted 21 September 2011 - 08:42 AM

Now that Groundspeak has made the "Friends" feature useful by allowing you to filter a logbook for your friend's finds, I have added my votes to this Feedback item:

Add Friends to the Your Profile menu


Right now the only access I can find to your Friends list is from the Quick View->Your Friends link. It should be in either the "My Profile" or "Community" drop-downs.

#261 User is offline   aka Momster 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 383
  • Joined: 18-January 08

Posted 21 September 2011 - 10:43 AM

View PostDon_J, on 21 September 2011 - 01:38 AM, said:

View Postaka Momster, on 20 September 2011 - 10:39 PM, said:

View PostDanPan, on 20 September 2011 - 01:04 PM, said:

View Postjellis, on 20 September 2011 - 12:57 PM, said:

If there is a log I can see it. But what I was hoping for is the images still linked to the cache page itself. Example you see in someone's gallery a great waterfall. You click the image and NOTHING. you see the image but not the cache page, so you still don't know what cache the picture was taken from.
If it has changed then I must be missing something.
At the bottom of the image there should be 2 links "View log" "Print Picture".
If you do not see the link, disable greasemonkey.


I have noticed that if the photo in the geocacher's gallery is for a trackable, rather than a geocache, it will not have the "View Log" link when you click to see the photo. It would be nice if they would add the link for those photos, too.


And, I have noticed that if I am viewing my gallery, through my public profile, I do not see images that I have attached directly to my cache listings. Can anyone confirm if they were always absent, or did they get lost in the shuffle?


Not a change. Photos uploaded to the cache page (not logs) did not show in your user profile gallery.

#262 User is offline   jellis 

  • Just keepin it fair and fun
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1909
  • Joined: 08-May 06

Posted 21 September 2011 - 11:36 AM

View PostDanPan, on 20 September 2011 - 01:04 PM, said:

View Postjellis, on 20 September 2011 - 12:57 PM, said:

If there is a log I can see it. But what I was hoping for is the images still linked to the cache page itself. Example you see in someone's gallery a great waterfall. You click the image and NOTHING. you see the image but not the cache page, so you still don't know what cache the picture was taken from.
If it has changed then I must be missing something.
At the bottom of the image there should be 2 links "View log" "Print Picture".
If you do not see the link, disable greasemonkey.

I guess you can't have it both ways. I turned off Greasemonkey and yes I see the logs now, but it is now back to the way it was and can't see the images as a slideshow.

#263 User is offline   klossner 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 478
  • Joined: 11-May 03

Posted 21 September 2011 - 07:23 PM

To plan a group trip, I used to pull up the "all logs" page for each cache and search for the members of my party. That's how I knew who had visited. Now I can't do that -- the URL modifier "&log=y" no longer works. The TOS forbid me to ask the group to send me their "found" PQs. So I can't plan these trips anymore.

#264 User is offline   Don_J 

  • Chatsworth, CA - The view is the treasure!
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 3622
  • Joined: 08-May 05

Posted 21 September 2011 - 09:55 PM

View Postklossner, on 21 September 2011 - 07:23 PM, said:

To plan a group trip, I used to pull up the "all logs" page for each cache and search for the members of my party. That's how I knew who had visited. Now I can't do that -- the URL modifier "&log=y" no longer works. The TOS forbid me to ask the group to send me their "found" PQs. So I can't plan these trips anymore.


Send everyone in your group a freind request and have them confirm it. You then click the View Logbook link and then choose the friends tab and you'll see exactly what you are looking for.

I think that this was one of the main reasons for the overhaul.

#265 User is offline   EdrickV 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 725
  • Joined: 20-February 11

Posted 22 September 2011 - 01:10 AM

View Postklossner, on 21 September 2011 - 07:23 PM, said:

To plan a group trip, I used to pull up the "all logs" page for each cache and search for the members of my party. That's how I knew who had visited. Now I can't do that -- the URL modifier "&log=y" no longer works. The TOS forbid me to ask the group to send me their "found" PQs. So I can't plan these trips anymore.


It's possible a "show all logs" type option may be re-implimented.
http://feedback.geoc...e-click-on-one-

#266 User is offline   Klatch 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1192
  • Joined: 22-January 02

Posted 22 September 2011 - 04:57 AM

View PostEdrickV, on 22 September 2011 - 01:10 AM, said:

It's possible a "show all logs" type option may be re-implimented.
http://feedback.geoc...e-click-on-one-

Quote

Thank you for your feedback. I have added this request to our internal queue for review. (31168)

<_<

#267 User is offline   dfx 

  • CDJ Abuser
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 8107
  • Joined: 06-April 07

Posted 22 September 2011 - 05:35 AM

View PostEdrickV, on 22 September 2011 - 01:10 AM, said:

It's possible a "show all logs" type option may be re-implimented.
http://feedback.geoc...e-click-on-one-


Don't hold your breath :ph34r:

#268 User is online   jholly 

  • I like the smell of a cache in the morning
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 7043
  • Joined: 16-August 02

Posted 22 September 2011 - 07:32 AM

View Postklossner, on 21 September 2011 - 07:23 PM, said:

To plan a group trip, I used to pull up the "all logs" page for each cache and search for the members of my party. That's how I knew who had visited. Now I can't do that -- the URL modifier "&log=y" no longer works. The TOS forbid me to ask the group to send me their "found" PQs. So I can't plan these trips anymore.

If you and your friends use GSAK Clyde published a TOS compliant macro to achieve the goal. Check out the Group Caching macro. A discussion of various methods is here. Also I think the version 8 api's will also provide the functionality.

This post has been edited by jholly: 22 September 2011 - 07:32 AM


#269 User is offline   dfx 

  • CDJ Abuser
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 8107
  • Joined: 06-April 07

Posted 22 September 2011 - 07:45 AM

View Postjholly, on 22 September 2011 - 07:32 AM, said:

Also I think the version 8 api's will also provide the functionality.


Hm, so now we're getting to a point where a limited number of 3rd party applications is able to provide more functionality than the website itself? Scary... :ph34r:

#270 User is online   jholly 

  • I like the smell of a cache in the morning
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 7043
  • Joined: 16-August 02

Posted 22 September 2011 - 07:52 AM

View Postdfx, on 22 September 2011 - 07:45 AM, said:

View Postjholly, on 22 September 2011 - 07:32 AM, said:

Also I think the version 8 api's will also provide the functionality.


Hm, so now we're getting to a point where a limited number of 3rd party applications is able to provide more functionality than the website itself? Scary... :ph34r:

Actually it is the website providing the functionality through the website api. It is the third party app that allows the use of that functionality.

#271 User is offline   dfx 

  • CDJ Abuser
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 8107
  • Joined: 06-April 07

Posted 22 September 2011 - 07:57 AM

View Postjholly, on 22 September 2011 - 07:52 AM, said:

View Postdfx, on 22 September 2011 - 07:45 AM, said:

View Postjholly, on 22 September 2011 - 07:32 AM, said:

Also I think the version 8 api's will also provide the functionality.


Hm, so now we're getting to a point where a limited number of 3rd party applications is able to provide more functionality than the website itself? Scary... :ph34r:

Actually it is the website providing the functionality through the website api. It is the third party app that allows the use of that functionality.


Yeah, that. Same difference. Means that by using the website only, you don't have access to that functionality.

#272 User is offline   Frank Broughton 

  • Buffalo, NY - All About Nothing Still
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1142
  • Joined: 25-August 07

Posted 22 September 2011 - 08:17 AM

Yes sure DFX, but by using the website ONLY you can never find a geocache. Many other third party things, like your legs is on the list too, are needed for geocaching. So ye little ole argument is not cutting it today :ph34r::P

#273 User is offline   dfx 

  • CDJ Abuser
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 8107
  • Joined: 06-April 07

Posted 22 September 2011 - 08:18 AM

View PostFrank Broughton, on 22 September 2011 - 08:17 AM, said:

Yes sure DFX, but by using the website ONLY you can never find a geocache. Many other third party things, like your legs is on the list too, are needed for geocaching. So ye little ole argument is not cutting it today :ph34r::P


I hope you're joking :rolleyes:

#274 User is offline   logscaler & Red 

  • Central Oregon Cacher.
  • Group: +Charter Members
  • Posts: 1083
  • Joined: 04-May 01

Posted 22 September 2011 - 07:43 PM

If I can whine I can say thank you.

Thanks for bringing the cacher updated coordinates back to the cache pages. There is a moving cache nearby that I find and watch that can ONLY be found with updated coordinates so old ones do me no good at all.

Logscaler.

#275 User is offline   nittany dave 

  • tough decisions
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 591
  • Joined: 01-August 01

Posted 23 September 2011 - 04:15 AM

View Postdfx, on 22 September 2011 - 07:45 AM, said:

View Postjholly, on 22 September 2011 - 07:32 AM, said:

Also I think the version 8 api's will also provide the functionality.


Hm, so now we're getting to a point where a limited number of 3rd party applications is able to provide more functionality than the website itself? Scary... :ph34r:

I don't think it's scary at all. Groundspeak is the listing service. They have the data that everyone wants to manipulate. Creating an API and allowing approved 3rd party software vendors access to it just opens it up and allows people to create all the slicing and dicing they could want and that Groundspeak simply doesn't have the time to create. After all, they are so busy creating wonderful new additions like challenges ;)
Seems like a good business model. Instead of hoarding the data, they have allowed others an opportunity to create functionality not present on the website and further solidify their position.
I'm thrilled with the new functionality GSAK has as a direct result of the API.

#276 User is offline   Frank Broughton 

  • Buffalo, NY - All About Nothing Still
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1142
  • Joined: 25-August 07

Posted 23 September 2011 - 05:05 AM

View Postnittany dave, on 23 September 2011 - 04:15 AM, said:


I'm thrilled with the new functionality GSAK has as a direct result of the API.


Me too Dave, I just hope they do not cut back our resources too much after this test period...

#277 User is offline   Dr.MORO 

  • Mad MAD Scientist Muhahaha!
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 306
  • Joined: 20-November 09

Posted 23 September 2011 - 06:27 AM

Domo!!!

Just experiencing something very weird, and want to know if anybody else is having the same issue.


I've posted a 'Feedback':
No TB logs, just only Cache logs in "Your Logs (Last 30 Days)"?

Screen grab 1

Screen grab 2


I just noticed this, but in "Your Profile" page, it used to show a list of ALL logs you've posted during the last 30 days.
Right now, it ONLY shows the Cache logs, and NO TB logs.
Weird...

This started after this update, but strangely not immediately after.
This is still happening in Safari 5.1 & Firefox 6.0.2 on Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard & 10.7 Lion, on two separate Macs, AND also on a Wintel machine with IE.

VERY Weird...

Is this just happening to my account?

~ Dr.MORO

#278 User is offline   dfx 

  • CDJ Abuser
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 8107
  • Joined: 06-April 07

Posted 23 September 2011 - 07:47 AM

View Postnittany dave, on 23 September 2011 - 04:15 AM, said:

View Postdfx, on 22 September 2011 - 07:45 AM, said:

View Postjholly, on 22 September 2011 - 07:32 AM, said:

Also I think the version 8 api's will also provide the functionality.


Hm, so now we're getting to a point where a limited number of 3rd party applications is able to provide more functionality than the website itself? Scary... :ph34r:

I don't think it's scary at all. Groundspeak is the listing service. They have the data that everyone wants to manipulate. Creating an API and allowing approved 3rd party software vendors access to it just opens it up and allows people to create all the slicing and dicing they could want and that Groundspeak simply doesn't have the time to create. After all, they are so busy creating wonderful new additions like challenges ;)
Seems like a good business model. Instead of hoarding the data, they have allowed others an opportunity to create functionality not present on the website and further solidify their position.
I'm thrilled with the new functionality GSAK has as a direct result of the API.


The problem is that in order to get that added functionality, you're now forced to use certain specific software. Not everybody does, can, or wants to use GSAK.

#279 User is offline   mamoreb 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1077
  • Joined: 31-July 10

Posted 23 September 2011 - 08:22 AM

View PostDr.MORO, on 23 September 2011 - 06:27 AM, said:

I just noticed this, but in "Your Profile" page, it used to show a list of ALL logs you've posted during the last 30 days.
Right now, it ONLY shows the Cache logs, and NO TB logs.
Weird...

This started after this update, but strangely not immediately after.
This is still happening in Safari 5.1 & Firefox 6.0.2 on Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard & 10.7 Lion, on two separate Macs, AND also on a Wintel machine with IE.

VERY Weird...

Is this just happening to my account?

~ Dr.MORO


I don't have this problem, I'm sorry.

#280 User is offline   t4e 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 4204
  • Joined: 15-March 08

Posted 23 September 2011 - 08:30 AM

View PostDr.MORO, on 23 September 2011 - 06:27 AM, said:



Is this just happening to my account?

~ Dr.MORO



yes, i see all my logs just fine

#281 User is offline   niraD 

  • rehcacoeG
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 5151
  • Joined: 24-January 06

Posted 23 September 2011 - 08:41 AM

I haven't seen a response to this, so I'm bumping it.

View PostniraD, on 15 September 2011 - 01:56 PM, said:

The links in my forum signature are now broken.

Should I recreate them using BBCode? Or is this bug going to be fixed?


#282 User is offline   Frank Broughton 

  • Buffalo, NY - All About Nothing Still
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1142
  • Joined: 25-August 07

Posted 23 September 2011 - 09:07 AM

View Postdfx, on 23 September 2011 - 07:47 AM, said:

View Postnittany dave, on 23 September 2011 - 04:15 AM, said:

View Postdfx, on 22 September 2011 - 07:45 AM, said:

View Postjholly, on 22 September 2011 - 07:32 AM, said:

Also I think the version 8 api's will also provide the functionality.


Hm, so now we're getting to a point where a limited number of 3rd party applications is able to provide more functionality than the website itself? Scary... :ph34r:

I don't think it's scary at all. Groundspeak is the listing service. They have the data that everyone wants to manipulate. Creating an API and allowing approved 3rd party software vendors access to it just opens it up and allows people to create all the slicing and dicing they could want and that Groundspeak simply doesn't have the time to create. After all, they are so busy creating wonderful new additions like challenges ;)
Seems like a good business model. Instead of hoarding the data, they have allowed others an opportunity to create functionality not present on the website and further solidify their position.
I'm thrilled with the new functionality GSAK has as a direct result of the API.


The problem is that in order to get that added functionality, you're now forced to use certain specific software. Not everybody does, can, or wants to use GSAK.


Kinda like if you want to utilize the road in your town you need a bike or an auto! hehe

#283 User is offline   dfx 

  • CDJ Abuser
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 8107
  • Joined: 06-April 07

Posted 23 September 2011 - 09:09 AM

View PostFrank Broughton, on 23 September 2011 - 09:07 AM, said:

View Postdfx, on 23 September 2011 - 07:47 AM, said:

View Postnittany dave, on 23 September 2011 - 04:15 AM, said:

View Postdfx, on 22 September 2011 - 07:45 AM, said:

View Postjholly, on 22 September 2011 - 07:32 AM, said:

Also I think the version 8 api's will also provide the functionality.


Hm, so now we're getting to a point where a limited number of 3rd party applications is able to provide more functionality than the website itself? Scary... :ph34r:

I don't think it's scary at all. Groundspeak is the listing service. They have the data that everyone wants to manipulate. Creating an API and allowing approved 3rd party software vendors access to it just opens it up and allows people to create all the slicing and dicing they could want and that Groundspeak simply doesn't have the time to create. After all, they are so busy creating wonderful new additions like challenges ;)
Seems like a good business model. Instead of hoarding the data, they have allowed others an opportunity to create functionality not present on the website and further solidify their position.
I'm thrilled with the new functionality GSAK has as a direct result of the API.


The problem is that in order to get that added functionality, you're now forced to use certain specific software. Not everybody does, can, or wants to use GSAK.


Kinda like if you want to utilize the road in your town you need a bike or an auto! hehe


Nope, kinda like I'd have to have a Nissan that runs on gas from Esso to use the roads. :rolleyes:

#284 User is offline   Moun10Bike 

  • Groundspeak Lackey
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 4802
  • Joined: 05-September 00

Posted 23 September 2011 - 02:27 PM

View PostniraD, on 23 September 2011 - 08:41 AM, said:

I haven't seen a response to this, so I'm bumping it.

View PostniraD, on 15 September 2011 - 01:56 PM, said:

The links in my forum signature are now broken.

Should I recreate them using BBCode? Or is this bug going to be fixed?



I'm not seeing issues with others' signatures. I would recommend that you recreate yours.

#285 User is offline   Dr.MORO 

  • Mad MAD Scientist Muhahaha!
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 306
  • Joined: 20-November 09

Posted 23 September 2011 - 03:20 PM

View PostDr.MORO, on 23 September 2011 - 06:27 AM, said:

Domo!!!

Just experiencing something very weird, and want to know if anybody else is having the same issue.


I've posted a 'Feedback':
No TB logs, just only Cache logs in "Your Logs (Last 30 Days)"?

Screen grab 1

Screen grab 2


I just noticed this, but in "Your Profile" page, it used to show a list of ALL logs you've posted during the last 30 days.
Right now, it ONLY shows the Cache logs, and NO TB logs.
Weird...

This started after this update, but strangely not immediately after.
This is still happening in Safari 5.1 & Firefox 6.0.2 on Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard & 10.7 Lion, on two separate Macs, AND also on a Wintel machine with IE.

VERY Weird...

Is this just happening to my account?

~ Dr.MORO



Domo again!!!

Self reply... Duh...

It just seems that due to my lagging logging, previous TB logs are just not showing because they are over 30 days old!

BUT, then why are the Cache logs over 30 days old are still showing???

~ Dr.MORO

#286 User is offline   knowschad 

  • Charter Nobody
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 17421
  • Joined: 20-May 05

Posted 23 September 2011 - 03:40 PM

View PostDon_J, on 21 September 2011 - 09:55 PM, said:

View Postklossner, on 21 September 2011 - 07:23 PM, said:

To plan a group trip, I used to pull up the "all logs" page for each cache and search for the members of my party. That's how I knew who had visited. Now I can't do that -- the URL modifier "&log=y" no longer works. The TOS forbid me to ask the group to send me their "found" PQs. So I can't plan these trips anymore.


Send everyone in your group a freind request and have them confirm it. You then click the View Logbook link and then choose the friends tab and you'll see exactly what you are looking for.

I think that this was one of the main reasons for the overhaul.


I really wish, though, that they had used an arbitrary, local list like the VIP script did, though. Many friends of mine are not accepting friends requests, and sometimes I may want to look at logs for somebody that I don't want on my friend's list. Tying that to the Friends list really limits its usefulness.

#287 User is online   jholly 

  • I like the smell of a cache in the morning
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 7043
  • Joined: 16-August 02

Posted 23 September 2011 - 03:59 PM

View Postknowschad, on 23 September 2011 - 03:40 PM, said:

View PostDon_J, on 21 September 2011 - 09:55 PM, said:

View Postklossner, on 21 September 2011 - 07:23 PM, said:

To plan a group trip, I used to pull up the "all logs" page for each cache and search for the members of my party. That's how I knew who had visited. Now I can't do that -- the URL modifier "&log=y" no longer works. The TOS forbid me to ask the group to send me their "found" PQs. So I can't plan these trips anymore.


Send everyone in your group a freind request and have them confirm it. You then click the View Logbook link and then choose the friends tab and you'll see exactly what you are looking for.

I think that this was one of the main reasons for the overhaul.


I really wish, though, that they had used an arbitrary, local list like the VIP script did, though. Many friends of mine are not accepting friends requests, and sometimes I may want to look at logs for somebody that I don't want on my friend's list. Tying that to the Friends list really limits its usefulness.

I went to the feedback site and asked for that very same thing. I was ripped to shreds for being a stalker. Please feel free to go here to pile on and say bad things about my idea. The consensus was ask them to be your friend. I don't know, never had a dog for a friend, don't know how my cat will like it, but I would be your friend. :)

#288 User is offline   niraD 

  • rehcacoeG
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 5151
  • Joined: 24-January 06

Posted 24 September 2011 - 09:39 PM

View PostMoun10Bike, on 23 September 2011 - 02:27 PM, said:

View PostniraD, on 23 September 2011 - 08:41 AM, said:

I haven't seen a response to this, so I'm bumping it.

View PostniraD, on 15 September 2011 - 01:56 PM, said:

The links in my forum signature are now broken.

Should I recreate them using BBCode? Or is this bug going to be fixed?



I'm not seeing issues with others' signatures. I would recommend that you recreate yours.
Yep. Weird. I didn't change anything, just re-saved the same settings and logged out and in. Now it's fine.

#289 User is offline   klossner 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 478
  • Joined: 11-May 03

Posted 25 September 2011 - 12:11 PM

It used to be, if I logged a cache but forgot to select the log type, I would get a nice message telling me I forgot to select the log type.

Now I get the generic "an error has occurred" page.

#290 User is offline   knowschad 

  • Charter Nobody
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 17421
  • Joined: 20-May 05

Posted 26 September 2011 - 05:35 AM

View Postjholly, on 23 September 2011 - 03:59 PM, said:

View Postknowschad, on 23 September 2011 - 03:40 PM, said:

View PostDon_J, on 21 September 2011 - 09:55 PM, said:

View Postklossner, on 21 September 2011 - 07:23 PM, said:

To plan a group trip, I used to pull up the "all logs" page for each cache and search for the members of my party. That's how I knew who had visited. Now I can't do that -- the URL modifier "&log=y" no longer works. The TOS forbid me to ask the group to send me their "found" PQs. So I can't plan these trips anymore.


Send everyone in your group a freind request and have them confirm it. You then click the View Logbook link and then choose the friends tab and you'll see exactly what you are looking for.

I think that this was one of the main reasons for the overhaul.


I really wish, though, that they had used an arbitrary, local list like the VIP script did, though. Many friends of mine are not accepting friends requests, and sometimes I may want to look at logs for somebody that I don't want on my friend's list. Tying that to the Friends list really limits its usefulness.

I went to the feedback site and asked for that very same thing. I was ripped to shreds for being a stalker. Please feel free to go here to pile on and say bad things about my idea. The consensus was ask them to be your friend. I don't know, never had a dog for a friend, don't know how my cat will like it, but I would be your friend. :)

Done. Thanks for creating the topic. Now, if it can get some more attention.

"Cyber-stalking"... geeze! What about "cyber-libel"? All this is doing (as you pointed out) is using the computer to filter the already publically available information.

#291 User is offline   IkeHurley13 

  • The Math guy
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1207
  • Joined: 26-December 08

Posted 26 September 2011 - 11:24 AM

I personally think they should hire LilDevil to help design. His scripts particularly the VIP list added a lot of functionality.

#292 User is offline   dfx 

  • CDJ Abuser
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 8107
  • Joined: 06-April 07

Posted 29 September 2011 - 07:08 AM

There's a new slight oddity that's a result of how logs are loaded now.

When you're about to post a new log on a cache page (you have the "log your visit" page open), open the cache page itself in a second tab or window.
Scroll down until the first batch of logs is loaded (10 of them), then stop scrolling so no more are loaded.
Go back to the first tab and post your log.
Go back to the second tab and scroll further down, until the next 10 logs are loaded. Now there's 20 of them loaded, but one of them (the last of the first 10) shows up double.

Quite a logical and expected result considering how the logs are loaded and no big deal, just something I thought I'd mention.

This post has been edited by dfx: 29 September 2011 - 07:09 AM


#293 User is offline   BudBundi 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 08-May 10

Posted 29 September 2011 - 03:30 PM

Today I have notice a strange bug.
I have log a "will attend" for an event but I can't see in in Eventlisting.
But I can see this log on my Profilpage and "Visit Log" also showing, when click the link the log is there.

#294 User is offline   OpinioNate 

  • Groundspeak Lackey
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 2031
  • Joined: 03-October 03

Posted 06 October 2011 - 10:16 AM

New release notes are posted!

Share this topic:


  • (6 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked