Groundspeak Forums: What is the deal with the Washington reviewers - Groundspeak Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What is the deal with the Washington reviewers

#1 User is offline   Runnystrong 

  • Geocacher
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 01-May 11

Posted 25 October 2011 - 07:43 AM

I submitted a Traditional cache on the 20th and here it is the 25th and it still has not been reviewed. There have been several caches published that were submitted after mine and they were published? In my area what is the deal I thought that it was a 3 day review process at most.

#2 User is offline   keehotee 

  • Geocacher
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 3017
  • Joined: 04-February 04

Posted 25 October 2011 - 07:46 AM

View PostRunnystrong, on 25 October 2011 - 07:43 AM, said:

I submitted a Traditional cache on the 20th and here it is the 25th and it still has not been reviewed. There have been several caches published that were submitted after mine and they were published? In my area what is the deal I thought that it was a 3 day review process at most.


Have you asked the reviewer?

#3 User is online   Lil Devil 

  • GPX Spinner
  • Group: +Charter Members
  • Posts: 4986
  • Joined: 26-June 01

Posted 25 October 2011 - 07:50 AM

Is your cache enabled? The reviewers won't see it unless it's enabled.

#4 User is offline   Runnystrong 

  • Geocacher
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 01-May 11

Posted 25 October 2011 - 07:52 AM

View Postkeehotee, on 25 October 2011 - 07:46 AM, said:

View PostRunnystrong, on 25 October 2011 - 07:43 AM, said:

I submitted a Traditional cache on the 20th and here it is the 25th and it still has not been reviewed. There have been several caches published that were submitted after mine and they were published? In my area what is the deal I thought that it was a 3 day review process at most.


Have you asked the reviewer?


There are several which one do I contact?

#5 User is offline   Runnystrong 

  • Geocacher
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 01-May 11

Posted 25 October 2011 - 07:52 AM

View PostLil Devil, on 25 October 2011 - 07:50 AM, said:

Is your cache enabled? The reviewers won't see it unless it's enabled.



Yes it is I triple checked

This post has been edited by Runnystrong: 25 October 2011 - 07:56 AM


#6 User is online   Lil Devil 

  • GPX Spinner
  • Group: +Charter Members
  • Posts: 4986
  • Joined: 26-June 01

Posted 25 October 2011 - 07:56 AM

View PostRunnystrong, on 25 October 2011 - 07:52 AM, said:

View PostLil Devil, on 25 October 2011 - 07:50 AM, said:

Is your cache enabled? The reviewers won't see it unless it's enabled.


Yes [it] is


Are you sure?

Edit to add I'll bet 10 quatloos that it isn't.

This post has been edited by Lil Devil: 25 October 2011 - 07:57 AM


#7 User is offline   Runnystrong 

  • Geocacher
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 01-May 11

Posted 25 October 2011 - 07:59 AM

View PostLil Devil, on 25 October 2011 - 07:56 AM, said:

View PostRunnystrong, on 25 October 2011 - 07:52 AM, said:

View PostLil Devil, on 25 October 2011 - 07:50 AM, said:

Is your cache enabled? The reviewers won't see it unless it's enabled.


Yes [it] is


Are you sure?

Edit to add I'll bet 10 quatloos that it isn't.



You're wrong it is... Just checked again

#8 User is offline   Bear and Ragged 

  • *.*
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 7262
  • Joined: 20-August 05

Posted 25 October 2011 - 08:07 AM

View PostRunnystrong, on 25 October 2011 - 07:59 AM, said:

View PostLil Devil, on 25 October 2011 - 07:56 AM, said:

View PostRunnystrong, on 25 October 2011 - 07:52 AM, said:

View PostLil Devil, on 25 October 2011 - 07:50 AM, said:

Is your cache enabled? The reviewers won't see it unless it's enabled.


Yes [it] is


Are you sure?

Edit to add I'll bet 10 quatloos that it isn't.



You're wrong it is... Just checked again

Had a look to see if the reviewer has left a note on the cache?

#9 User is offline   Pup Patrol 

  • Ontario, Canada
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 4548
  • Joined: 09-April 05

Posted 25 October 2011 - 08:10 AM

Hard to believe someone with 43 hides doesn't understand the review process or how to contact a reviewer.

I think you could pick one reviewer to contact, and if it isn't in that person's queue, they could probably check things out any way.

#10 User is offline   Touchstone 

  • Chubby TB
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 2498
  • Joined: 16-June 03

Posted 25 October 2011 - 08:12 AM

Are you really, really, really sure?

I suspect that someone in this thread knows what they're talking about :)

#11 User is offline   Gan Dalf 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 616
  • Joined: 20-October 07

Posted 25 October 2011 - 08:28 AM

View PostPup Patrol, on 25 October 2011 - 08:10 AM, said:

Hard to believe someone with 43 hides doesn't understand the review process or how to contact a reviewer.

I think you could pick one reviewer to contact, and if it isn't in that person's queue, they could probably check things out any way.


I would look harder on how long a cacher has been a memeber than how many hides they have...


To the OP:
I would write to either Rock Rabbit, Cascade Reviewer, Ice and Wind (who is a man BTW) or Wizard of Ooze. Probably the one you want to choose is the reviewer that has published most of your other cachers. Personally I hae found Wizard of Ooze to be the mosty responsive to e-mails through their profile page.

If it got missed then it should not be a problem. If there is some other issue then I would expect tht you might have to wait a while longer...

#12 User is offline   Pup Patrol 

  • Ontario, Canada
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 4548
  • Joined: 09-April 05

Posted 25 October 2011 - 08:33 AM

View PostFobesMan, on 25 October 2011 - 08:28 AM, said:

View PostPup Patrol, on 25 October 2011 - 08:10 AM, said:

Hard to believe someone with 43 hides doesn't understand the review process or how to contact a reviewer.

I think you could pick one reviewer to contact, and if it isn't in that person's queue, they could probably check things out any way.


I would look harder on how long a cacher has been a memeber than how many hides they have...


To the OP:
I would write to either Rock Rabbit, Cascade Reviewer, Ice and Wind (who is a man BTW) or Wizard of Ooze. Probably the one you want to choose is the reviewer that has published most of your other cachers. Personally I hae found Wizard of Ooze to be the mosty responsive to e-mails through their profile page.

If it got missed then it should not be a problem. If there is some other issue then I would expect tht you might have to wait a while longer...


He's been through the review process 43 times already. How long someone has used an account name doesn't tell us much.

Hard to believe that a user could go through the review process 43 times already and not hit even one tiny glitch.

#13 User is online   Lil Devil 

  • GPX Spinner
  • Group: +Charter Members
  • Posts: 4986
  • Joined: 26-June 01

Posted 25 October 2011 - 08:36 AM

It should also be noted that the submission process has changed. In the past, when you submitted a new cache, there was a checkbox at the top of the form to enable the submission. By default it was checked.

Currently, the same checkbox is farther down on the page, below the coordinate entry box, and it is NOT checked by default.

I stand by my prediction that the OP's cache is not enabled.

#14 User is offline   palmetto 

  • Serenoa repens
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1053
  • Joined: 05-December 05

Posted 25 October 2011 - 09:13 AM

To the OP, the cache that you wrote up on 10/20 is disabled. As is the cache you wrote up yesterday.

They need to be enabled to be seen in the review queue. They both have this warning at the top:

The reviewers will not see this listing until you enable it.
This cache is temporarily unavailable. Read the logs below to read the status for this cache.


The cache report form was subtly changed in the recent site update. Caches are disabled by default. You must enable them.

#15 User is offline   Clan Riffster 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 9210
  • Joined: 26-December 04

Posted 25 October 2011 - 09:48 AM

View PostLil Devil, on 25 October 2011 - 08:36 AM, said:

I stand by my prediction that the OP's cache is not enabled.


View Postpalmetto, on 25 October 2011 - 09:13 AM, said:

The reviewers will not see this listing until you enable it.

We have a winner! :lol:

#16 User is offline   knowschad 

  • Charter Nobody
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 17432
  • Joined: 20-May 05

Posted 25 October 2011 - 09:51 AM

View Postpalmetto, on 25 October 2011 - 09:13 AM, said:

The cache report form was subtly changed in the recent site update. Caches are disabled by default. You must enable them.


I, for one, did not know this. I don't recall it being listed in the release notes, either, although I could be wrong. I think changing the default is a great idea, but moving its location and changing the default at the same time is bound to cause a lot of confusion.

#17 User is offline   GeoBain 

  • Geocacher
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1632
  • Joined: 14-January 11

Posted 25 October 2011 - 10:00 AM

View Postknowschad, on 25 October 2011 - 09:51 AM, said:

I think changing the default is a great idea, but moving its location and changing the default at the same time is bound to cause a lot of confusion.


I agree. But this part should still be clear as a bell. Especially if you have been asked repeatedly to check if it is enabled.

The reviewers will not see this listing until you enable it.
This cache is temporarily unavailable. Read the logs below to read the status for this cache.


#18 User is offline   Gitchee-Gummee 

  • Minor Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 7787
  • Joined: 12-June 09

Posted 25 October 2011 - 10:18 AM

eh...
A little trip over your own feet occasionally is a humbling, yet good thing. :rolleyes:

#19 User is offline   hzoi 

  • When in doubt -- bushwhack!
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1968
  • Joined: 23-February 07

Posted 25 October 2011 - 01:55 PM

I have to say, after filling out 26 submittal forms the other day, the new check box does tend to blend in with the rest of the form. Putting it in bold text might help a bit. Just adding those seven extra characters to the HTML would save some time and angst.

#20 User is offline   dphickey 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 124
  • Joined: 03-July 10

Posted 25 October 2011 - 03:44 PM

Another thing that I found was if you create the cache, and then go back into the cache to edit it, things like the attributes disappear if you don't re-select them all again. That may be the same with the enable check box.

#21 User is offline   SwineFlew 

  • Nobody
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 2913
  • Joined: 23-September 09

Posted 25 October 2011 - 03:49 PM

This thread make me wanna hit my head on a brick wall. :ph34r:

#22 User is offline   popokiiti 

  • Victoria, BC, Canada
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 2321
  • Joined: 15-November 07

Posted 25 October 2011 - 04:32 PM

Was it #36? I see a "new" cache in your profile of 44 hides.....


edit - published today.

This post has been edited by popokiiti: 25 October 2011 - 04:35 PM


#23 User is offline   niraD 

  • rehcacoeG
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 6710
  • Joined: 24-January 06

Posted 25 October 2011 - 04:50 PM

View Postdphickey, on 25 October 2011 - 03:44 PM, said:

Another thing that I found was if you create the cache, and then go back into the cache to edit it, things like the attributes disappear if you don't re-select them all again. That may be the same with the enable check box.
Are you sure? I just edited an unpublished cache, and all the attributes remained in place...

#24 User is online   jholly 

  • I like the smell of a cache in the morning
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 7771
  • Joined: 16-August 02

Posted 25 October 2011 - 05:11 PM

View PostniraD, on 25 October 2011 - 04:50 PM, said:

View Postdphickey, on 25 October 2011 - 03:44 PM, said:

Another thing that I found was if you create the cache, and then go back into the cache to edit it, things like the attributes disappear if you don't re-select them all again. That may be the same with the enable check box.
Are you sure? I just edited an unpublished cache, and all the attributes remained in place...

Probably did not check the boxes for saying they read and understand the guidelines. Without that nothing is saved.

#25 User is offline   knowschad 

  • Charter Nobody
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 17432
  • Joined: 20-May 05

Posted 25 October 2011 - 05:29 PM

View PostSwineFlew, on 25 October 2011 - 03:49 PM, said:

This thread make me wanna hit my head on a brick wall. :ph34r:


Please don't let us stop you!! :laughing:

#26 User is offline   popokiiti 

  • Victoria, BC, Canada
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 2321
  • Joined: 15-November 07

Posted 25 October 2011 - 07:54 PM

"Pull over for some cache" #36 and #37 are published, no finds yet....were these the two caches the OP was talking about?

#27 User is offline   Team Pixos 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 565
  • Joined: 26-June 11

Posted 25 October 2011 - 08:24 PM

I'm laughing my head off over the Lil Devil

#28 User is offline   jellis 

  • Just keepin it fair and fun
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 2208
  • Joined: 08-May 06

Posted 25 October 2011 - 08:34 PM

View PostLil Devil, on 25 October 2011 - 08:36 AM, said:

It should also be noted that the submission process has changed. In the past, when you submitted a new cache, there was a checkbox at the top of the form to enable the submission. By default it was checked.

Currently, the same checkbox is farther down on the page, below the coordinate entry box, and it is NOT checked by default.

I stand by my prediction that the OP's cache is not enabled.

So many times I have suggested this and so many times I heard. No we like it this way and most said they can have the cache page put together without ever having to uncheck the box. Well hats off to you guys. Some of us take longer and I am glad they finally changed it. It is tough to find though when you do want to check it but less likely to hit it by accident.

#29 User is offline   Bear and Ragged 

  • *.*
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 7262
  • Joined: 20-August 05

Posted 26 October 2011 - 02:20 AM

View Postknowschad, on 25 October 2011 - 09:51 AM, said:

View Postpalmetto, on 25 October 2011 - 09:13 AM, said:

The cache report form was subtly changed in the recent site update. Caches are disabled by default. You must enable them.


I, for one, did not know this. I don't recall it being listed in the release notes, either, although I could be wrong. I think changing the default is a great idea, but moving its location and changing the default at the same time is bound to cause a lot of confusion.


I get the weekly Groundspeak newsletter, I'm signed up to get the Groundspeak notifications*, neither have said anything about this... :unsure:

Quote

E-Mail Preferences

Do not show my email address to other users.
Inform me of helpful tips, new features and changes to the web site.
I want to receive the Groundspeak weekly newsletter.

*In fact, I've never received anything via this method!

This post has been edited by Bear and Ragged: 26 October 2011 - 02:20 AM


#30 User is offline   GeoGeeBee 

  • This space intentionally left blank
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 2106
  • Joined: 12-August 09

Posted 26 October 2011 - 08:47 AM

I think you misspelled "Texas" in the subject line.

#31 User is online   jholly 

  • I like the smell of a cache in the morning
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 7771
  • Joined: 16-August 02

Posted 26 October 2011 - 08:56 AM

View PostGeoGeeBee, on 26 October 2011 - 08:47 AM, said:

I think you misspelled "Texas" in the subject line.

:unsure: :blink: :lol: :lol: :lol:

#32 User is offline   knowschad 

  • Charter Nobody
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 17432
  • Joined: 20-May 05

Posted 26 October 2011 - 09:54 AM

View Postjholly, on 26 October 2011 - 08:56 AM, said:

View PostGeoGeeBee, on 26 October 2011 - 08:47 AM, said:

I think you misspelled "Texas" in the subject line.

:unsure: :blink: :lol: :lol: :lol:

+1!!

#33 User is offline   ArcherDragoon 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1207
  • Joined: 23-June 06

Posted 26 October 2011 - 10:45 AM

View Postknowschad, on 25 October 2011 - 05:29 PM, said:

View PostSwineFlew, on 25 October 2011 - 03:49 PM, said:

This thread make me wanna hit my head on a brick wall. :ph34r:


Please don't let us stop you!! :laughing:

This thread makes me want to watch Seinfeld reruns!!!

"What is the deal with..."

#34 User is offline   GeoBain 

  • Geocacher
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1632
  • Joined: 14-January 11

Posted 26 October 2011 - 10:53 AM

View PostArcherDragoon, on 26 October 2011 - 10:45 AM, said:

View Postknowschad, on 25 October 2011 - 05:29 PM, said:

View PostSwineFlew, on 25 October 2011 - 03:49 PM, said:

This thread make me wanna hit my head on a brick wall. :ph34r:


Please don't let us stop you!! :laughing:

This thread makes me want to watch Seinfeld reruns!!!

"What is the deal with..."


Glad to see I wasn't the only one. :laughing:

#35 User is offline   knowschad 

  • Charter Nobody
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 17432
  • Joined: 20-May 05

Posted 26 October 2011 - 11:02 AM

View PostArcherDragoon, on 26 October 2011 - 10:45 AM, said:

View Postknowschad, on 25 October 2011 - 05:29 PM, said:

View PostSwineFlew, on 25 October 2011 - 03:49 PM, said:

This thread make me wanna hit my head on a brick wall. :ph34r:


Please don't let us stop you!! :laughing:

This thread makes me want to watch Seinfeld reruns!!!

"What is the deal with..."


So... what's the deal with film cans? I mean, they're not film, and they're not cans. (Not that there is anything wrong with that.)

:D HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! :P

#36 User is online   jholly 

  • I like the smell of a cache in the morning
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 7771
  • Joined: 16-August 02

Posted 26 October 2011 - 11:06 AM

View Postknowschad, on 26 October 2011 - 11:02 AM, said:

View PostArcherDragoon, on 26 October 2011 - 10:45 AM, said:

View Postknowschad, on 25 October 2011 - 05:29 PM, said:

View PostSwineFlew, on 25 October 2011 - 03:49 PM, said:

This thread make me wanna hit my head on a brick wall. :ph34r:


Please don't let us stop you!! :laughing:

This thread makes me want to watch Seinfeld reruns!!!

"What is the deal with..."


So... what's the deal with film cans? I mean, they're not film, and they're not cans. (Not that there is anything wrong with that.)

:D HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! :P

At the risk of reveling my age, they at one time were cans. Nice little aluminum cans with a nice steel screw top and a nice rubber gasket. Why did I throw that big bag of them out years ago? One probably has to spend a kings ransom to buy one of those today.

#37 User is offline   Dgwphotos 

  • Covington, WA
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1837
  • Joined: 03-October 05

Posted 26 October 2011 - 11:12 AM

View Postjholly, on 26 October 2011 - 11:06 AM, said:

View Postknowschad, on 26 October 2011 - 11:02 AM, said:

View PostArcherDragoon, on 26 October 2011 - 10:45 AM, said:

View Postknowschad, on 25 October 2011 - 05:29 PM, said:

View PostSwineFlew, on 25 October 2011 - 03:49 PM, said:

This thread make me wanna hit my head on a brick wall. :ph34r:


Please don't let us stop you!! :laughing:

This thread makes me want to watch Seinfeld reruns!!!

"What is the deal with..."


So... what's the deal with film cans? I mean, they're not film, and they're not cans. (Not that there is anything wrong with that.)

:D HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! :P

At the risk of reveling my age, they at one time were cans. Nice little aluminum cans with a nice steel screw top and a nice rubber gasket. Why did I throw that big bag of them out years ago? One probably has to spend a kings ransom to buy one of those today.

I believe they are kind of collectable. Try Ebay.

#38 User is offline   knowschad 

  • Charter Nobody
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 17432
  • Joined: 20-May 05

Posted 26 October 2011 - 11:24 AM

View PostDgwphotos, on 26 October 2011 - 11:12 AM, said:

View Postjholly, on 26 October 2011 - 11:06 AM, said:

View Postknowschad, on 26 October 2011 - 11:02 AM, said:

View PostArcherDragoon, on 26 October 2011 - 10:45 AM, said:

View Postknowschad, on 25 October 2011 - 05:29 PM, said:

View PostSwineFlew, on 25 October 2011 - 03:49 PM, said:

This thread make me wanna hit my head on a brick wall. :ph34r:


Please don't let us stop you!! :laughing:

This thread makes me want to watch Seinfeld reruns!!!

"What is the deal with..."


So... what's the deal with film cans? I mean, they're not film, and they're not cans. (Not that there is anything wrong with that.)

:D HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! :P

At the risk of reveling my age, they at one time were cans. Nice little aluminum cans with a nice steel screw top and a nice rubber gasket. Why did I throw that big bag of them out years ago? One probably has to spend a kings ransom to buy one of those today.

I believe they are kind of collectable. Try Ebay.


I guess I shouldn't quit my job to become a stand-up comic, huh?

#39 User is offline   Dgwphotos 

  • Covington, WA
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1837
  • Joined: 03-October 05

Posted 26 October 2011 - 12:59 PM

View Postknowschad, on 26 October 2011 - 11:24 AM, said:

View PostDgwphotos, on 26 October 2011 - 11:12 AM, said:

View Postjholly, on 26 October 2011 - 11:06 AM, said:

View Postknowschad, on 26 October 2011 - 11:02 AM, said:

View PostArcherDragoon, on 26 October 2011 - 10:45 AM, said:

View Postknowschad, on 25 October 2011 - 05:29 PM, said:

View PostSwineFlew, on 25 October 2011 - 03:49 PM, said:

This thread make me wanna hit my head on a brick wall. :ph34r:


Please don't let us stop you!! :laughing:

This thread makes me want to watch Seinfeld reruns!!!

"What is the deal with..."


So... what's the deal with film cans? I mean, they're not film, and they're not cans. (Not that there is anything wrong with that.)

:D HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! :P

At the risk of reveling my age, they at one time were cans. Nice little aluminum cans with a nice steel screw top and a nice rubber gasket. Why did I throw that big bag of them out years ago? One probably has to spend a kings ransom to buy one of those today.

I believe they are kind of collectable. Try Ebay.


I guess I shouldn't quit my job to become a stand-up comic, huh?

He'll be here all week, folks... :lol:

#40 User is offline   baloo&bd 

  • Caching Couple
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 3193
  • Joined: 29-March 03

Posted 26 October 2011 - 01:22 PM

View Postpopokiiti, on 25 October 2011 - 07:54 PM, said:

"Pull over for some cache" #36 and #37 are published, no finds yet....were these the two caches the OP was talking about?



Gee, all you guys didn't even get a chance to say "you're welcome".

#41 User is offline   Team WorldTour 

  • Halfway to somewhere....
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 18
  • Joined: 09-May 09

Posted 26 October 2011 - 02:03 PM

So did the issue get resolved? I got lost in the serial quoting of everything said before that was off topic.
The OP is steaming about 5 days wait? I'm going on two months! If he tried to list a cache in Germany, he would blow a gasket!

#42 User is offline   Gan Dalf 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 616
  • Joined: 20-October 07

Posted 26 October 2011 - 02:11 PM

View PostTeam WorldTour, on 26 October 2011 - 02:03 PM, said:

So did the issue get resolved? I got lost in the serial quoting of everything said before that was off topic.
The OP is steaming about 5 days wait? I'm going on two months! If he tried to list a cache in Germany, he would blow a gasket!


Way back in post number 14, a reviewer reported to the OP that they had gone to the listing and determined that the CO/OP had not checked the box that puts an unpublished cache into the review Queue. The OP has been silent ever since...

#43 User is offline   LightHouseSeekers 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 229
  • Joined: 20-December 07

Posted 26 October 2011 - 02:21 PM

Yes, I see that is unchecked by default (listing enabled),
though the note still says otherwise that you must uncheck it yourself.
Overall that sounds like a good thing so one doesn't submit a cache
that isn't really ready to be found. Problem I see is that part
of the submission page is easy to overlook.


Side note: I still have real film cans laying around.

#44 User is offline   Pup Patrol 

  • Ontario, Canada
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 4548
  • Joined: 09-April 05

Posted 26 October 2011 - 02:47 PM

View PostFobesMan, on 26 October 2011 - 02:11 PM, said:

View PostTeam WorldTour, on 26 October 2011 - 02:03 PM, said:

So did the issue get resolved? I got lost in the serial quoting of everything said before that was off topic.
The OP is steaming about 5 days wait? I'm going on two months! If he tried to list a cache in Germany, he would blow a gasket!


Way back in post number 14, a reviewer reported to the OP that they had gone to the listing and determined that the CO/OP had not checked the box that puts an unpublished cache into the review Queue. The OP has been silent ever since...


Post #14:

View Postpalmetto, on 25 October 2011 - 09:13 AM, said:

To the OP, the cache that you wrote up on 10/20 is disabled. As is the cache you wrote up yesterday.

They need to be enabled to be seen in the review queue. They both have this warning at the top:

The reviewers will not see this listing until you enable it.
This cache is temporarily unavailable. Read the logs below to read the status for this cache.


The cache report form was subtly changed in the recent site update. Caches are disabled by default. You must enable them.


Post #22:

View Postpopokiiti, on 25 October 2011 - 04:32 PM, said:

Was it #36? I see a "new" cache in your profile of 44 hides.....


edit - published today.


Yup, once the problem was solved, the new caches were published. And have already been found.

#45 User is online   Lil Devil 

  • GPX Spinner
  • Group: +Charter Members
  • Posts: 4986
  • Joined: 26-June 01

Posted 26 October 2011 - 06:26 PM

View PostFobesMan, on 26 October 2011 - 02:11 PM, said:

The OP has been silent ever since...

Hard to type with egg on his face. :anitongue:

#46 User is offline   Dgwphotos 

  • Covington, WA
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1837
  • Joined: 03-October 05

Posted 26 October 2011 - 07:57 PM

View PostTeam WorldTour, on 26 October 2011 - 02:03 PM, said:

So did the issue get resolved? I got lost in the serial quoting of everything said before that was off topic.
The OP is steaming about 5 days wait? I'm going on two months! If he tried to list a cache in Germany, he would blow a gasket!

I don't recommend taking your issue into another thread.

#47 User is offline   knowschad 

  • Charter Nobody
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 17432
  • Joined: 20-May 05

Posted 26 October 2011 - 08:02 PM

View PostTeam WorldTour, on 26 October 2011 - 02:03 PM, said:

So did the issue get resolved? I got lost in the serial quoting of everything said before that was off topic.
The OP is steaming about 5 days wait? I'm going on two months! If he tried to list a cache in Germany, he would blow a gasket!


Yes, we've noticed.

#48 User is offline   knowschad 

  • Charter Nobody
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 17432
  • Joined: 20-May 05

Posted 26 October 2011 - 08:05 PM

View PostLil Devil, on 26 October 2011 - 06:26 PM, said:

View PostFobesMan, on 26 October 2011 - 02:11 PM, said:

The OP has been silent ever since...

Hard to type with egg on his face. :anitongue:


Posted Image

#49 User is offline   jellis 

  • Just keepin it fair and fun
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 2208
  • Joined: 08-May 06

Posted 26 October 2011 - 09:09 PM

Yes guys I am sure he probably finally got the joke with all the Are you Sures.
Oh Lil Devil that puzzle I had all you guys try out at the event went live Thanks to Nomex.
Maybe you should come over and try it for real. Along with some of my other ones.

#50 User is offline   jellis 

  • Just keepin it fair and fun
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 2208
  • Joined: 08-May 06

Posted 26 October 2011 - 09:13 PM

Oh Shoot, I think I know who the OP is. Shame on him.

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic