Groundspeak Forums: pocket queries - Groundspeak Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

pocket queries search single user

#1 User is offline   boneyard68 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: 22-June 11

Posted 03 April 2012 - 02:00 PM

Is there a easy way select all unfound caches by a single user and make a pocket queries so that I can search for just those caches?

#2 User is offline   StarBrand 

  • StarBrand - WNAG.NET
  • Group: +Charter Members
  • Posts: 18631
  • Joined: 30-January 02

Posted 03 April 2012 - 02:05 PM

Not right now.

I have long been told that each cacher should have a bookmark list made public of all of their hides. Thus it would be easy to do a PQ on that.

I have long advocated many additions to the PQ criteria including keyword searches and include/exclude by username.

#3 User is offline   AZcachemeister 

  • Forum Flounder Extraordinaire
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 7432
  • Joined: 09-December 02

Posted 03 April 2012 - 06:23 PM

View PostStarBrand, on 03 April 2012 - 02:05 PM, said:

...each cacher should have a bookmark list made public of all of their hides


Hmmm, I'll have to think about that.
There HAS to be a downside, I wonder what it is?

#4 User is offline   boneyard68 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: 22-June 11

Posted 03 April 2012 - 06:52 PM

View PostStarBrand, on 03 April 2012 - 02:05 PM, said:

Not right now.

I have long been told that each cacher should have a bookmark list made public of all of their hides. Thus it would be easy to do a PQ on that.

I have long advocated many additions to the PQ criteria including keyword searches and include/exclude by username.


Well I guess I could do it that way.. But he has over 400 hidden caches.. So was hoping in this age of scripts and programs.. A Site like this could have an easy solution... It can't be that hard to add search by user to the pq list... Is it?

#5 User is offline   Walts Hunting 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 3328
  • Joined: 30-September 04

Posted 04 April 2012 - 02:36 AM

As always the answer is GSAK. API allows to specify owner of cache. Easy solution.

This post has been edited by Walts Hunting: 04 April 2012 - 02:51 AM


#6 User is offline   ras_oscar 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 1021
  • Joined: 21-November 08

Posted 04 April 2012 - 04:44 AM

GSAK has many options, including sorting by hider name. That would make them fall out together in the list.

#7 User is offline   Walts Hunting 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 3328
  • Joined: 30-September 04

Posted 04 April 2012 - 07:48 AM

View Postras_oscar, on 04 April 2012 - 04:44 AM, said:

GSAK has many options, including sorting by hider name. That would make them fall out together in the list.


You don't have to make it that complicated. Use the API and request only a specific hiders csches. The downside is the 30 miLee radius.

#8 User is offline   boneyard68 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: 22-June 11

Posted 04 April 2012 - 08:04 AM

I give gsak a look.. I never knew about it.
Thanks

#9 User is offline   Walts Hunting 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 3328
  • Joined: 30-September 04

Posted 04 April 2012 - 09:17 AM

View PostStarBrand, on 03 April 2012 - 02:05 PM, said:

Not right now.

I have long been told that each cacher should have a bookmark list made public of all of their hides. Thus it would be easy to do a PQ on that.

I have long advocated many additions to the PQ criteria including keyword searches and include/exclude by username.


It seems so easy for people to tell everyone else what they "should" do. I don't think enough people search by owner for the many thousands to "should" do that.

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic