Newbie choosing first gps so many choices, what are your thoughts?
#1
Posted 06 April 2012 - 08:50 PM
I was introduced to geocaching last summer/fall and I have played around here and there using my blackberry and my tomtom.
They work okay, but I know that a gps made for geocaching works 100 times better and now I think I'm ready to up my game.
Finances are kind of tight so I can't afford a unit thats going to cost me over 300 dollars, so what would you, the more seasoned geocachers recommend for someone like me to help me really get my feet wet.
I've been eyeballing the megellan exporist and the garmin dakota 20. I like being able to simply download co-ordinates but what I NEED to make sure I can do is be able to manually input the coordinates as well.
Suggestions?
Thanks for reading.
c0|d_f1r3
#2
Posted 06 April 2012 - 08:53 PM
#3
Posted 07 April 2012 - 05:57 AM
This post has been edited by randco: 07 April 2012 - 05:57 AM
#4
Posted 07 April 2012 - 06:52 PM
#5
Posted 07 April 2012 - 06:57 PM
Best of luck!
Tom
#6
Posted 07 April 2012 - 07:21 PM
#7
Posted 10 April 2012 - 07:30 PM
StarBrand, on 06 April 2012 - 08:53 PM, said:
Hello, I was wondering why you recommend the etrex over the Dakota. I am looking to purchase my first unit and these were on my list actually a etrex 20 and a Dakota 10, not 20. I am having a difficult time deciding which is better and if worth spending the money on or since I am just starting out if a Magellan 110, or 310 would be a be a better choice. I know there is a performance difference on the 110 but the others are around the same. I would use it mostly for geocaching, but also have a canoe and a mt bike, so I will eventually use it for more.
#8
Posted 13 April 2012 - 05:41 AM
#9
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:09 AM
crhubbard74, on 10 April 2012 - 07:30 PM, said:
StarBrand, on 06 April 2012 - 08:53 PM, said:
Hello, I was wondering why you recommend the etrex over the Dakota. I am looking to purchase my first unit and these were on my list actually a etrex 20 and a Dakota 10, not 20. I am having a difficult time deciding which is better and if worth spending the money on or since I am just starting out if a Magellan 110, or 310 would be a be a better choice. I know there is a performance difference on the 110 but the others are around the same. I would use it mostly for geocaching, but also have a canoe and a mt bike, so I will eventually use it for more.
The etrex includes the capability to talk to the Russian GPS system as well as the US one. This allows your unit to see more satellites than ever and calculate a more accurate position. It uses newer faster processors. Plus the eTrex has far better battery life and the screen is far more readable in most outdoors situations.
#11
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:57 AM
#12
Posted 13 April 2012 - 10:05 AM
#13
Posted 13 April 2012 - 10:08 AM
#14
Posted 13 April 2012 - 10:27 AM
StarBrand, on 06 April 2012 - 08:53 PM, said:
I totally agree. We've had the 20 for a couple of months now and really like it over our old 76csx. Accuracy and paperless caching is what sold me, not to mention the compact size.
#15
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:47 PM
StarBrand, on 13 April 2012 - 08:09 AM, said:
crhubbard74, on 10 April 2012 - 07:30 PM, said:
StarBrand, on 06 April 2012 - 08:53 PM, said:
Hello, I was wondering why you recommend the etrex over the Dakota. I am looking to purchase my first unit and these were on my list actually a etrex 20 and a Dakota 10, not 20. I am having a difficult time deciding which is better and if worth spending the money on or since I am just starting out if a Magellan 110, or 310 would be a be a better choice. I know there is a performance difference on the 110 but the others are around the same. I would use it mostly for geocaching, but also have a canoe and a mt bike, so I will eventually use it for more.
The etrex includes the capability to talk to the Russian GPS system as well as the US one. This allows your unit to see more satellites than ever and calculate a more accurate position. It uses newer faster processors. Plus the eTrex has far better battery life and the screen is far more readable in most outdoors situations.
Hello,
I finally pulled the trigger and bought the etrex 20, I ordered it online and hope to have it in a few days. Thanks for all the information that everyone provided, it was nice to hear from people who use the product not some saleman. I cannot wait to use it I looked today and there are 250 caches within 10 miles of where I live. I do not care if they are easy or difficult I am just stoked there are so many.
#16
Posted 17 April 2012 - 09:47 AM
Southerngal410, on 13 April 2012 - 05:41 AM, said:
I'm using the 10. Chose it because of price and the need to learn of what I may want in a GPSr. I've only been GC'g for a couple of months. We can find them with it. If I were to upgrade today, I would choose the 30 for the extras it brings and it's under 300$ online. As long as you are aware of the 10s limitations, I think you will be happy. I could write more but I'm lazy.
BP
#17
Posted 17 April 2012 - 11:17 AM
Happy Caching

Help








