Groundspeak Forums: What does this Cacher mean? - Groundspeak Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What does this Cacher mean? Weird log left on my cache?!

#1 User is offline   geo-surprise! 

  • Tadpole
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 28-January 11

Posted 05 August 2012 - 09:00 PM

Campcacher (I think that's his name) left a note on my (at geocaching.com) cache, "Xtreme Cachers Only", he said this;

"Hmmmm??? Seems fishy to me. First cache, first to find, found no more??? See fishy."

Does anybody know what this guy is talking about?

For info on the cache, go here, http://coord.info/GC2VBA8

#2 User is offline   Keystone 

  • Everything in Moderation
  • Group: Site Wide Moderators
  • Posts: 15451
  • Joined: 16-May 03

  Posted 05 August 2012 - 09:13 PM

Moving from Feature Suggestions forum.

#3 User is offline   jholly 

  • I like the smell of a cache in the morning
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 7054
  • Joined: 16-August 02

Posted 05 August 2012 - 09:20 PM

View Postgeo-surprise!, on 05 August 2012 - 09:00 PM, said:

Campcacher (I think that's his name) left a note on my (at geocaching.com) cache, "Xtreme Cachers Only", he said this;

"Hmmmm??? Seems fishy to me. First cache, first to find, found no more??? See fishy."

Does anybody know what this guy is talking about?

For info on the cache, go here, http://coord.info/GC2VBA8

He believes the person that found the cache and is first to find on the cache may not have signed the logbook, i.e., an armchair log.

#4 User is offline   Hot Pepper Crew 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 117
  • Joined: 28-June 09

Posted 05 August 2012 - 09:35 PM

I agree that's what he meant. I would also be skeptical of the FTFer since it was their first (and only) find, and his Found It log doesn't sound like the log of someone who has never cached before. The FTF was last November, did you ever stop by and verify that the FTFer did indeed sign the log book?

#5 User is offline   MAntunes 

  • Endangered Species
  • Group: +Charter Members
  • Posts: 348
  • Joined: 10-April 02

Posted 05 August 2012 - 10:58 PM

Have you tried to ask Campcacher what he meant with his note? Mabybe he could explain it.

#6 User is offline   popokiiti 

  • Victoria, BC, Canada
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 2149
  • Joined: 15-November 07

Posted 05 August 2012 - 11:34 PM

I would check that Curcon did indeed sign the log at your cache, and if not, delete the bogus log. I think the note you are referring to is exactly what was mentioned by jholly.
You may want to make a note in the description that it is a dangerous cache, and folks should be careful. Eventually your notes will end up off the page on GPSs.

#7 User is offline   zack_black 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 76
  • Joined: 10-September 11

Posted 06 August 2012 - 12:14 AM

Sour grapes maby? That would be my first thought.

#8 User is offline   OZ2CPU 

  • Does it matter at all
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 941
  • Joined: 10-September 06

Posted 06 August 2012 - 01:15 AM

it is compleetly OK, to nicely complain if you find bogus logs online,
not all are lying, it is posible pages could be missing from the logbook,
but if it is FTF the log is new, and he should write on the first page,
BUT once I did see a FTF sign the last page in the log !! very funny move..

#9 User is offline   Sol seaker 

  • I don't have my florescent hat
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 2140
  • Joined: 16-March 09

Posted 06 August 2012 - 02:11 AM

View Postgeo-surprise!, on 05 August 2012 - 09:00 PM, said:

Campcacher (I think that's his name) left a note on my (at geocaching.com) cache, "Xtreme Cachers Only", he said this;

"Hmmmm??? Seems fishy to me. First cache, first to find, found no more??? See fishy."

Does anybody know what this guy is talking about?

For info on the cache, go here, http://coord.info/GC2VBA8


He's saying he doesn't think that guy actually found it. I am skeptical too.
But I am also skeptical of your.coordinates.
Did you use a real GPS or a smart phone.to get those Coords? Smart phones may be good for finding things, but they are really bad for hiding.
Did you use.waypoint averaging on the GPS?
Did your GPS have fresh batteries in it when you took the coords? Worn out batteries have gotten me Coords that were over 100 feet off.
I think you needed to double check the Coords rather than just telling people to look harder.
Also it would be good to put a note on the cache page saying it is a dangerous cache.

#10 User is offline   timbee&suebee 

  • Premium Member
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 84
  • Joined: 02-June 11

Posted 06 August 2012 - 03:26 AM

I'd have to agree with everyone else. He's suggesting that since your cache has yet to have a find at all, even by experienced cachers, that it is unlikley that this person with one find (yours) found it so easily. Have you gone out to check your cache and make sure this finder has actually logged in? If not, delete his entry.

I think your bigger issue would be why has your cache been up for over a year with only this one supposed find? If you make it so difficult that no one can find it anyone checking out your cache page is going to see that and no one is going to bother looking for it.

#11 User is offline   The A-Team 

  • On the jazz since 2009
  • Group: +Premium Members
  • Posts: 3438
  • Joined: 15-March 09

Posted 06 August 2012 - 10:11 AM

View PostSol seaker, on 06 August 2012 - 02:11 AM, said:

He's saying he doesn't think that guy actually found it. I am skeptical too.
But I am also skeptical of your.coordinates.

I'm also skeptical of both of the above. That supposed FTF log is obviously a bogus log and, after checking the physical log to make sure, should be deleted. Also, from what the DNFers have been saying, your coordinates are off. They said the coordinates put them in an open area on a trail, but you say it's off a cliff. These don't match. Have you tried navigating to your own coordinates to make sure they're accurate?

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic