+WalruZ Posted February 25, 2004 Share Posted February 25, 2004 EBRPD Banning Geocaches? is a thread dealing with a problem in the San Francisco bay area. Two counties on the east side of the bay, a very large area, have parks administered by a regional parks body. It's a lot of land, and for some reason they have gotten a bug in their bonnet and, word is, are banning geocaches from their parks. We locals are trying to figure out the best way to approach the problem. What we would like is advice from people who have had the same problem in other parts of the country. obviously, personalites will differ, but any case studies would interest us. What happened? How bad was the problem? How did you structure a response? What was the outcome? What suggestions might you have for us? Thanks in advance. Quote Link to comment
+robert Posted February 25, 2004 Share Posted February 25, 2004 Definitely need to show them what geocaching is about. Find someone who is in charge and see if they'd like to sit down and talk about geocaching and their concerns, or even go out and find one to see what it's all about. Make sure to pick up trash on the way and explain CITO. If you haven't done so already, once that's done, make sure to open dialogue with all area parks officials so this doesn't happen in the first place. Here in MD we have guidelines and contact info for most all parks. http://www.mdgps.org/modules.php?name=Parks Quote Link to comment
+WalruZ Posted February 25, 2004 Author Share Posted February 25, 2004 yeah, we know who is in charge. word is there is an edict to remove caches from him. our question is what is the best approach to take - as a group? individually in an ad-hoc way? or what? Quote Link to comment
+briansnat Posted February 25, 2004 Share Posted February 25, 2004 (edited) If you already have a regional geocaching organization, go through them. They probably have experience with this sort of stuff. If not, you can try to form one so you can put your heads together and come up with a strategy. Then choose one, or two people to present your case. Some things you can do: Point out the various entities who have embraced the sport to one degree, or another. The BLM, Cleveland parks (who have actually placed some of their own caches), states like PA, Ark and MD, many Audobon preserves, the St Johns Water Management District in FLa and countless others ('m sure people here can add to the list). Point out the benefits of the sport. Whats in it for them? Increased recreational opportunities for users, with minimal expense on their part. More park visitors. More people who are aware of the area and become advocates for the park system. Also, correct misconceptons. I noticed in the letter in the thread you referenced they said "disturbances to historic and cultural structures, fences being cut and sensitive habitat being dug up in the search for buried caches." I haven't been there, but I doubt caches are being buried and fences are being cut by geocachers. So be sure to set them straight on this (but if its true, then perhaps the ban is warranted). Edited February 25, 2004 by briansnat Quote Link to comment
+woo2 Posted February 25, 2004 Share Posted February 25, 2004 I haven't been there, but I doubt caches are being buried and fences are being cut by geocachers. So be sure to set them straight on this (but if its true, then perhaps the ban is warranted). This is our responsiblity to address this, but it's probably safe to say that Geocaching is being used as a scapegoat for the activities of others. How did this person come to their conclusion? Was the a Geocaching advocate present? If not, which seems to be the case, it leaves room for the "fear of the unknown" and false assumptions. Definitely schedule a face to face meeting, preferably through a local Geocaching organization if one exists. It lends more credibility than an individual. Quote Link to comment
+RockyRiver Posted February 25, 2004 Share Posted February 25, 2004 Just remember, It is better to beg forgivness, than ask permission. Unless jail time is involved. Quote Link to comment
+TeamK-9 Posted February 25, 2004 Share Posted February 25, 2004 You know I'd like to point out that there doesn't seem to be any solid proof that this "edict" is just coming out, just that there's a "word on the street" Quote Link to comment
Trogdor! Posted February 26, 2004 Share Posted February 26, 2004 Looks to me that your regulatory agency may be setting a policy based on caches being placed in areas they may consider sensitive (not uncommon in shoreline, wetlands, or riparian habitat). From the link found in the link, the three caches were all in a shoreline park, I’m willing to bet that none of the three had even thought of asking permission to place the caches and just placed them on public property with out thought of the consequences. It’s quite possible that those three caches are going to cause you to go into a damage control mode. Perhaps when dealing with the agency clearly defined guidelines could be established based upon those used by others. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.