Cache Rescue And Adoption Area Save the caches!
#101
Posted 16 September 2004 - 12:26 PM
#102
Posted 16 September 2004 - 08:23 PM
bigeddy, on Sep 15 2004, 10:51 AM, said:
The trouble is that the owners last checked in September 2003 and are listed as "Not Validated Member." The email <j.hendershott@verizon.net> given on the cache page is not current. To work properly someone needs to adopt it and maintain the cache page with new coordinates when it is moved. Also, the cache type should probably be changed to "Mystery." Physical maintenance for this type of cache depends greatly on the finders but has not been a problem in nearly 3 years.
Anyone want to take ownership? I like these kinds of caches (in small doses) and would hate to see it go away, so I'd be happy to take it if no one else expresses an interest.
When adopting a cache we first make sure that the cache meets current guidelines and unfortunately moving caches are no longer permitted. The best thing would be for a local to pick it up and post a 'should be archived' note. The cache can be fixed up and recreated as a 'Memorial' cache.
If you need any help getting this done please feel free to email me.
#103
Posted 17 September 2004 - 03:39 PM
I sent an e-mail last week offering help but I haven't gotten a reply. Since I just put a cache at the lake it would be easy for me to maintain this one as well.
#104
Posted 27 September 2004 - 11:31 AM
I should add in here as well the Bullitt Fireplace Cache (GCC3B0). I'd be happy to take over this one as well.
This post has been edited by lahontan: 27 September 2004 - 12:15 PM
#105
Posted 28 September 2004 - 11:46 AM
MarcusArelius, on Sep 17 2004, 03:39 PM, said:
I sent an e-mail last week offering help but I haven't gotten a reply. Since I just put a cache at the lake it would be easy for me to maintain this one as well.
Hmm, It looks like I own this one now. I had expected a transfer notification. Oh well, thanks.
#106
Posted 28 September 2004 - 01:20 PM
#107
Posted 30 September 2004 - 02:09 PM
#108
Posted 04 October 2004 - 09:27 AM
lahontan, on Sep 27 2004, 12:31 PM, said:
I should add in here as well the Bullitt Fireplace Cache (GCC3B0). I'd be happy to take over this one as well.
I looked at both of these caches.
Tie Mill (GC4B3) is listed as being owned by dmollick who is still somewhat active. It looks like the cache is in good shape so unless the current owner wishes to give up ownership I don't see any need to take action at this point.
Bullitt Fireplace Cache (GCC3B0) is owned by Too Cool who is still active and signing in to the site so again it is fine as is for now.
#109
Posted 04 October 2004 - 10:58 AM
Team Misguided, on Oct 4 2004, 09:27 AM, said:
Tie Mill (GC4B3) is listed as being owned by dmollick who is still somewhat active. It looks like the cache is in good shape so unless the current owner wishes to give up ownership I don't see any need to take action at this point.
Bullitt Fireplace Cache (GCC3B0) is owned by Too Cool who is still active and signing in to the site so again it is fine as is for now.
[QUOTE]
Great, glad the owners are still active and things seem to be in order.
#110
Posted 05 October 2004 - 04:46 PM
Thank you,
Maxwell Q
BTW, a cacher from the NW told me to come here when I went caching with in New Mexico last weekend.
#113
Posted 06 October 2004 - 03:45 PM
Thanks,
Georganne
doula1@alaska.net
This post has been edited by 1stimestar: 06 October 2004 - 03:45 PM
#114
Posted 06 October 2004 - 09:22 PM
1stimestar, on Oct 6 2004, 03:45 PM, said:
Thanks,
Georganne
doula1@alaska.net
I tried emailing the contact info on this page and it was returned.
#115
Posted 10 October 2004 - 06:46 AM
#116
Posted 10 October 2004 - 03:02 PM
I'm willing to adopt, but maybe someone who lives really close would like to?
This post has been edited by jcar: 10 October 2004 - 03:27 PM
#117
Posted 10 October 2004 - 06:35 PM
GO West, on Oct 10 2004, 06:46 AM, said:
I've e-mailed GEMs, who goes to church with HunkOfGod, and asked him to take a look.
#118
Posted 23 October 2004 - 09:38 PM
#119
Posted 01 November 2004 - 07:07 AM
#120
Posted 01 November 2004 - 09:58 AM
lahontan, on Nov 1 2004, 08:07 AM, said:
That's been transfered to you now.
#121
Posted 14 November 2004 - 05:52 PM
So I assume they are no longer active. The cache is Burrows Island, GCC5FB. Anacortes, WA. Absolutly beautiful Pacific Northwest views from here.
What do we now do to have someone volunteer to take ownership of this cache?
#122
Posted 14 November 2004 - 07:03 PM
For some reason the owners disabled the cache but people keep finding it.
They haven't logged in since July so I don't know if they are still around.
I'm never in the area so I don't want to adopt it but maybe someone in that area could.
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_detai...c7-83ed6c420479
#123
Posted 14 November 2004 - 09:28 PM
#124
Posted 14 November 2004 - 11:04 PM
LthrWrk, on Nov 14 2004, 06:52 PM, said:
So I assume they are no longer active. The cache is Burrows Island, GCC5FB. Anacortes, WA. Absolutly beautiful Pacific Northwest views from here.
What do we now do to have someone volunteer to take ownership of this cache?
I've posted an adoption request note to the cache page for this cache. Hopefully someone will step up and take care of this one.
TMJ
#125
Posted 17 November 2004 - 09:47 AM
Team Misguided, on Nov 14 2004, 11:04 PM, said:
LthrWrk, on Nov 14 2004, 06:52 PM, said:
So I assume they are no longer active. The cache is Burrows Island, GCC5FB. Anacortes, WA. Absolutly beautiful Pacific Northwest views from here.
What do we now do to have someone volunteer to take ownership of this cache?
I've posted an adoption request note to the cache page for this cache. Hopefully someone will step up and take care of this one.
TMJ
I can take care of it. I live about 2 miles from there. I also know it to be a convenient access cache.
Lthrwrk,
When you were last there, was the container in OK shape? Did it just need a logbook and maybe some new loot?
I can get to it early on Saturday morning.
#126
Posted 17 November 2004 - 10:15 AM
As I recall the contents were only a little damp. Container in good shape. It seems like so many caches ago heheh.
#127
Posted 19 November 2004 - 10:49 AM
soreyes, on Nov 17 2004, 09:47 AM, said:
Team Misguided, on Nov 14 2004, 11:04 PM, said:
LthrWrk, on Nov 14 2004, 06:52 PM, said:
So I assume they are no longer active. The cache is Burrows Island, GCC5FB. Anacortes, WA. Absolutly beautiful Pacific Northwest views from here.
What do we now do to have someone volunteer to take ownership of this cache?
I've posted an adoption request note to the cache page for this cache. Hopefully someone will step up and take care of this one.
TMJ
I can take care of it. I live about 2 miles from there. I also know it to be a convenient access cache.
Lthrwrk,
When you were last there, was the container in OK shape? Did it just need a logbook and maybe some new loot?
I can get to it early on Saturday morning.
I stopped at this cache today and did some maintenance:
- Swapped the leaky plastic cache container for an ammo can.
- removed the tired and torn plastic bag
- Added a pile of new treasure
- Added a new logbook
- Put the old log book in a new ziplock, marked it as full, and put it back in the bottom of the container
- added a small ziplock for the small and delicate treasures
- replaced and scattered the ridiculous pile of sticks used as 'hiding material' with some bark segments that cover it in a more stealthy fashion
I also added the cache to my watchlist so that I can keep an eye on how it all holds up.
#128
Posted 19 November 2004 - 11:33 AM
travisl, on Oct 23 2004, 09:38 PM, said:
Yay! Looks like this one is getting maintained and upgraded this weekend
#129
Posted 08 December 2004 - 06:01 PM
Edit, I heard back from the cache owner and he went ahead and disabled the cache. This cache isn't in any special place, but would be a shame to see another one go by the wayside with so many finding it.
This post has been edited by GeoRoo: 08 December 2004 - 06:17 PM
#130
Posted 14 December 2004 - 12:15 PM
#131
Posted 23 December 2004 - 07:13 AM
#132
Posted 23 December 2004 - 11:19 AM
drive
bike
run
take the bus
roller-ski
swim
glide
shuffle
scoot
by them every day?
#133
Posted 23 December 2004 - 12:28 PM
#134
Posted 25 December 2004 - 09:45 PM
PS curmudgeonlygal looks like she has two belly button in her posting sig pic.
#135
Posted 30 December 2004 - 09:33 AM
Syn, on Dec 25 2004, 09:45 PM, said:
PS curmudgeonlygal looks like she has two belly button in her posting sig pic.
Who wants all the work it would take to make those caches work? Noctournal Omissions is GONE. All the glint stuff is gone, we went out and double checked last summer (you are welcome). Rainbow Kisser is GONE. We double checked this one last summer as well.
And the Brew caches- thanks, but no thanks. There would be so much work to make those work correctly that why should someone want to bother. When a local starts placing caches in that area, I'm sure someone will clue them in to the abandoned vacation caches along the path. Maybe in a year or so there will be someone local who can figure out the clues from the archived pages and find the caches and use them to place some nice caches of their own.
I'm sure your caches near home are nice but 3 of these caches had serious problems. The one you did try to fix took lots of cajoling from us and we live over 150 miles away from them. And the Brew caches still have serious problems with the multi steps.
The only caches anyone could even adopt would be the Brews and in their cases, why not just contact the Great Falls geocaching group- GFGF on Smartgroups.com- and see what response you get there.
-Jennifer (who found all 4 of the Syn in MT caches)
#136
Posted 24 January 2005 - 10:10 AM
#137
Posted 28 January 2005 - 11:53 AM
#138
Posted 29 January 2005 - 01:01 AM
... could use a new caretaker. The owner hasn't logged into the website since July of 2003, and email bounces back as a nonexistent account. When we were out there this past weekend, it was rather visible, and there was moldy dog food, mustard packets, etc inside the cache. The container is also not as waterproof as it could be, anymore, and the TB that's listed as in it, hasn't been in it since sometime in 2003 (May, I think?). We cleaned it up and camoflaged it as best we could, and would be quite willing to adopt it and take over maintenance and all on a more formal basis. It's a nice spot.
#139
Posted 29 January 2005 - 10:06 AM
chamois-shimi & special K, on Jan 29 2005, 02:01 AM, said:
... could use a new caretaker. The owner hasn't logged into the website since July of 2003, and email bounces back as a nonexistent account. When we were out there this past weekend, it was rather visible, and there was moldy dog food, mustard packets, etc inside the cache. The container is also not as waterproof as it could be, anymore, and the TB that's listed as in it, hasn't been in it since sometime in 2003 (May, I think?). We cleaned it up and camoflaged it as best we could, and would be quite willing to adopt it and take over maintenance and all on a more formal basis. It's a nice spot.
I've posted a note on the cache page. If I don't hear back from them in a week I'll consider the adoption. Please email or PM me to confirm that you'd like to adopt this cache.
Thanks,
Team Misguided
#140
Posted 03 February 2005 - 05:57 PM
Thanks!
This post has been edited by bugel-shunra: 03 February 2005 - 05:57 PM
#141
Posted 05 February 2005 - 08:24 PM
This post has been edited by Nomadic Man: 05 February 2005 - 08:25 PM
#142
Posted 06 February 2005 - 12:18 PM
Nomadic Man, on Feb 5 2005, 09:24 PM, said:
First we will need to see if the cache is still there. If it is still there then we can see about getting it fixed up and adopted. If it is missing, as it seems, then the cache should be archived.
#143
Posted 16 February 2005 - 12:36 AM
#144
Posted 16 February 2005 - 08:39 AM
Bonch, on Feb 16 2005, 01:36 AM, said:
The best thing in this case would be to submit a new cache page.
#145
Posted 27 February 2005 - 07:50 PM
I've tried contacting the owner about it but the email bounced back.
I'm in the area every few weeks visiting family so maintaing it would be easy.
#146
Posted 03 March 2005 - 10:50 PM
Night_Hawk, on Feb 27 2005, 07:50 PM, said:
I've tried contacting the owner about it but the email bounced back.
I'm in the area every few weeks visiting family so maintaing it would be easy.
I'm not sure what you'd actually be adopting. Did you actually find the micro that's supposed to be there?
We stopped briefly while on our honeymoon, but like everyone else logged it 'virtually'. While it might possible be a good place for a physical cache there's nothing in the area that really works as a virtual. If I get to vote, I'd say archive the old cache and open up the area to someone active.
But that's just me...
#147
Posted 03 March 2005 - 11:46 PM
Night_Hawk, on Feb 27 2005, 07:50 PM, said:
I've tried contacting the owner about it but the email bounced back.
I'm in the area every few weeks visiting family so maintaing it would be easy.
Before an adoption is considered I review the cache to make sure it meets current guidelines. Since this cache doesn't meet the current listing guidelines for a virtual cache, and the physical container is missing, I've archived the listing.
I think this is the best way to handle a cache like this because it allows an active local to place a new cache at this spot.
#148
Posted 10 March 2005 - 06:15 PM
#149
Posted 12 March 2005 - 11:47 AM
lahontan, on Mar 10 2005, 06:15 PM, said:
Well it looks like he visited the site yesterday. I've posted a note to the cache page asking him to fix it up. We'll just keep an eye on it and see what happens.
#150
Posted 12 March 2005 - 08:51 PM
Just Past Point No Point by Evergreenhiker! and ladynitewind
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_detai...e1-76ccd028162f
The listing will be visible once it has been approved.
This post has been edited by evergreenhiker!: 12 March 2005 - 08:52 PM

Help








