+OzarksJim Posted July 13, 2004 Share Posted July 13, 2004 Is it possible for me to run a PQ for caches I COULDN'T find (not caches I HAVEN'T found)? In other words, can I run a PQ for caches I logged as DNF? I would like to periodically run this so I can see the caches I couldn't find but have been found recently, so I know they are (almost definitely) there and not muggled. I did not see an option for this when attempting to create the PQ. If this is not possible, I think this would be a good feature to have. Thanks. Link to comment
+planetrobert Posted July 13, 2004 Share Posted July 13, 2004 cant do that but WOW that is a good idea I have not heard before. Link to comment
Jeremy Posted July 13, 2004 Share Posted July 13, 2004 I could grab caches that had a "not found" log by you, but it would also include the ones you had not found but found later. Interesting idea though. I'll look into it. Link to comment
+sbell111 Posted July 13, 2004 Share Posted July 13, 2004 Interesting idea. The way it is now, these caches just stay in my normal PQ and I try to find them the next time I am caching in the area. I'm not sure if I would want a PQ of just the caches that I couldn't find and have not yet found. This could make for a very disheartening caching journey. Link to comment
+BlueDeuce Posted July 13, 2004 Share Posted July 13, 2004 Goodness! Do people have so many DNFs they need a PQ? Personally I just set up a watch on them for results of other seekers. Link to comment
+IV_Warrior Posted July 14, 2004 Share Posted July 14, 2004 I could grab caches that had a "not found" log by you, but it would also include the ones you had not found but found later. Interesting idea though. I'll look into it. Would putting it in the "AND" section help? If you select caches I "DNF" AND "I haven't found" would it return just your DNF's, and not the ones you subsequently found? Link to comment
+norbu Posted July 14, 2004 Share Posted July 14, 2004 oh, that was elegant IV Warrior. I think you are correct. Link to comment
+IV_Warrior Posted July 14, 2004 Share Posted July 14, 2004 oh, that was elegant IV Warrior. I think you are correct. Well, it sounds like it would work, but I'd imagine if it was that simple, Jeremy would have already thought of it. Just tossed it out there, "just in case". Link to comment
Recommended Posts